A Pragmatic Framework for Single-site and Multisite Data Quality Assessment in Electronic Health Record-based Clinical Research
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 9101744 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Michael G Kahn (0000-0003-4786-6875, Colorado Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute, autor correspondente), Marsha A Raebel (0000-0002-8485-7161, Kaiser Permanente), Jason M Glanz (0000-0002-1950-7034, Colorado School of Public Health), Karen Riedlinger (Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research), J F Steiner (0000-0002-6514-6057, Kaiser Permanente) |
| Ano | 2012 |
| Volume | 50 |
| Páginas | S21-S29 |
| Data de publicação | 2012-07-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Não |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Medical Care (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948 |
| Editora | Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1097/mlr.0b013e318257dd67 |
| PMID | 22692254 |
| PMCID | PMC3833692 |
| OpenAlex | W2134256069 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 8 |
| Referências citadas | 27 |
INTRODUCTION: Answers to clinical and public health research questions increasingly require aggregated data from multiple sites. Data from electronic health records and other clinical sources are useful for such studies, but require stringent quality assessment. Data quality assessment is particularly important in multisite studies to distinguish true variations in care from data quality problems. METHODS: We propose a "fit-for-use" conceptual model for data quality assessment and a process model for planning and conducting single-site and multisite data quality assessments. These approaches are illustrated using examples from prior multisite studies. APPROACH: Critical components of multisite data quality assessment include: thoughtful prioritization of variables and data quality dimensions for assessment; development and use of standardized approaches to data quality assessment that can improve data utility over time; iterative cycles of assessment within and between sites; targeting assessment toward data domains known to be vulnerable to quality problems; and detailed documentation of the rationale and outcomes of data quality assessments to inform data users. The assessment process requires constant communication between site-level data providers, data coordinating centers, and principal investigators. DISCUSSION: A conceptually based and systematically executed approach to data quality assessment is essential to achieve the potential of the electronic revolution in health care. High-quality data allow "learning health care organizations" to analyze and act on their own information, to compare their outcomes to peers, and to address critical scientific questions from the population perspective
Data mining · Data quality · Data science · Documentation · Health care · Management science · Operations management · Process (computing) · Quality (philosophy) · Computer Science · Data Quality and Management · Electronic Health Records Systems · Engineering · Ethics in Clinical Research
Examining the effects of technology anxiety and resistance to change on the acceptance of breast tumor registry system
Challenges in Using Electronic Health Record Data for CER
Data Quality Assessment for Comparative Effectiveness Research in Distributed Data Networks
Systematically assessing the quality of dental electronic health record data for an investigation into oral health care disparities
Evaluating sport-for-development outcome measures used in a living lab setting
Overcoming the Challenges of Unstructured Data in Multisite, Electronic Medical Record-based Abstraction
Opportunities and Challenges for Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER) With Electronic Clinical Data
Commentary
| Obras citantes distintas | 8 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,57 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2012 - 2025 (14) |
| Velocidade de citação | recent |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 5 |