Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Contribution of HCAHPS Specific Care Experiences to Global Ratings Varies Across 7 Countries

What Can be Learned for Reporting These Global Ratings

Datos Bibliográficos

ID9101957
AutoresBenedict O Orindi (KU Leuven), Benedict Orindi (0000-0002-4601-7890, African Population and Health Research Center, autor de correspondencia), Emmanuel Lesaffre (0000-0002-3747-6905, KU Leuven, autor de correspondencia), Adrian Quintero (0000-0001-7268-2221, KU Leuven, autor de correspondencia), Walter Sermeus (0000-0002-5915-1845, KU Leuven), Luk Bruyneel (0000-0003-1209-692X, KU Leuven)
Año2019
Volumen57
Número11
Páginase65-e72
Fecha de publicación2019-11-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaMedical Care (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948
EditorialOvid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1097/mlr.0000000000001077
PMID30807453
OpenAlexW2917732164
IdiomaEN
Referencias citadas31

BACKGROUND: Given the increased international interest in improvement strategies for patient experiences with care, it is important to understand whether the same specific care experiences affect global ratings across countries. Moreover, reporting of these global ratings currently substantially varies in both research and public reporting. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to examine the differential magnitude of associations between Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) specific care experiences and global ratings, and to explore implications for reporting these global ratings. METHODS: HCAHPS data were collected from 11,289 patients across 7 European countries. We studied the association between 11 experience items and 2 global ratings (0-10 hospital rating, hospital recommendation) using multilevel ordered logistic regression analysis. Using interaction terms, we examined consistency of these associations across countries. Assuming homogeneous use and interpretations of response categories of these specific experiences across patients within and between countries, we investigated what the associations between specific experiences and global ratings imply for reporting global ratings across countries. RESULTS: All specific experiences were associated with both global ratings. "Being talked to about care after leaving the hospital" showed the strongest association. There were relatively little differential effects across countries. A reporting strategy with different cutpoints across countries might provide a more equitable comparison of global ratings. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlight a differential contribution of HCAHPS specific experiences to overall ratings across countries. Research and public reporting may consider examining in more detail within and across populations global rating cutpoints that represent the same true level of positive patient experiences

Affect (linguistics) · Consistency (knowledge bases) · Differential (mechanical device) · Family medicine · Global health · Health care · Logistic regression · MEDLINE · Multilevel model · Political science · Public health · Statistics · Healthcare Policy and Management · Medicine · Nursing · Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare · Primary Care and Health Outcomes · Psychology

  • Statistical Analysis With Missing Data

    Maureen Lahiff, Roderick J A Little et al.•Journal of the American…•1989

  • Patient safety, satisfaction, and quality of hospital care

    Open Access•Linda H Aiken, Walter Sermeus et al.•BMJ•2012

  • The cost of dichotomising continuous variables

    Open Access•David G Altman, Douglas G Altman et al.•BMJ•2006

  • Comparability of self rated health

    Open Access•Joshua A Salomon•BMJ•2004

  • Regression Models for Ordinal Data

    Open Access•Peter McCullagh•Journal of the Royal Statistical…•1980

  • Differential Item Functioning Results May Change Depending On How An Item Is Scored

    Open Access•Michaela N Gelin, Bruno D Zumbo•Educational and Psychological…•2003

  • Promises and Pitfalls of Anchoring Vignettes in Health Survey Research

    Open Access•Hanna Grol-Prokopczyk, Emese Verdes-Tennant et al.•Demography•2015

  • Associations of CAHPS Composites With Global Ratings of the Doctor Vary by Medicare Beneficiaries’ Health Status

    Ron D Hays, Joshua S Mallett et al.•Medical Care•2018

  • Impact of Cross-level Measurement Noninvariance on Hospital Rankings Based on Patient Experiences With Care in 7 European Countries

    Benedict O Orindi, Benedict Orindi et al.•Medical Care•2017

  • Do Differential Response Rates to Patient Surveys Between Organizations Lead to Unfair Performance Comparisons

    Catherine L Saunders, Marc N Elliott et al.•Medical Care•2016

  • Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Patient Experience With Communication in Hospitals

    Junya Zhu, Saul N Weingart et al.•Medical Care•2015

  • Survey Response Style and Differential Use of CAHPS Rating Scales by Hispanics

    Robert Weech-Maldonado, Marc N Elliott et al.•Medical Care•2008

  • Patient Judgments of Hospital Quality A Taxonomy

    Mark Meterko, Haya R Rubin•Medical Care•1990

  • Components of Care Vary in Importance for Overall Patient-Reported Experience by Type of Hospitalization

    Marc N Elliott, David E Kanouse et al.•Medical Care•2009

  • Enhancing the Validity and Cross-Cultural Comparability of Measurement in Survey Research

    Open Access•Gary King, Christopher J L Murray et al.•American Political Science Review•2004

Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae