Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

A Multicenter Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial of Strategies to Improve Thyroid Function Testing

Bibliographic Data

ID9102128
AuthorsValentin Daucourt, Florence Saillour-Glénisson, Philippe Michel (0000-0001-8455-8332, corresponding author), Marthe-Aline Jutand, Marthe‐Aline Jutand (0000-0002-3548-2666), Abdelilah Abouelfath (corresponding author)
Year2003
Volume41
Issue3
Pages432-441
Publication date2003-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueMedical Care (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948
PublisherOvid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1097/01.mlr.0000053216.33277.a4
PMID12618646
OpenAlexW2326325942
LanguageEN
References cited25

OBJECTIVES: This project aimed to compare the independent and combined effectiveness of two implementation interventions of guidelines for ordering thyroid function tests: a Memorandum Pocket Card (MPC) and a Test Request Form (TRF). RESEARCH DESIGN: Intervention groups were wards. The study used an experimental 2*2 factorial design with matching hospitals according to size and activity and wards according to preintervention appropriateness for test ordering. Four ward groups were established: the dual intervention group, the order form group, the pocket card group and the control group. Physicians in all groups received guidelines and were invited to a local information meeting. MEASURES: The main outcome measure of effectiveness was the Guideline Conformity Rate (GCR). RESULTS: Six hospitals participated in the study (two middle-sized hospitals, two small-sized hospitals and two psychiatric hospitals). A total of 1412 orders for thyroid function tests were collected. GCR was 78% in the dual intervention group, 83% in the order form group, 73% in the pocket card group and 62% in the control group. The interaction between TRF and MPC was not significant (beta = -0.70; P = 0.21). Compared with simple information, TRF was effective in increasing GCR (OR, 2.65; 95% CI, 1.52-4.62), unlike MPC (OR, 1.28; CI, 0.75-2.19). CONCLUSIONS: Using a robust design, our study shows the greater effectiveness of TRF than MPC and their association in implementing thyroid function test guidelines

Guideline · Psychological intervention · Randomized controlled trial · Test (biology) · Thyroid · Thyroid function · Thyroid function tests · Clinical practice guidelines implementation · Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention · Internal Medicine · Medicine · Nursing · Thyroid Disorders and Treatments

  • Closing the gap between research and practice

    Open Access•Lisa A Bero, Lisa Bero et al.•BMJ•1998

  • Multisite Randomized Controlled Trials in Health Services Research

    Morris Weinberger, Eugene Ž Oddone et al.•Medical Care•2001

  • Changing Provider Behavior

    Jeremy M Grimshaw, Liz Shirran et al.•Medical Care•2001

  • Methods of Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials in Health Services Research

    E Andrew Balas, Suzanne Austin et al.•Medical Care•1995

  • Improving House Staff Ordering of Three Common Laboratory Tests

    Kurt Kroenke, James F Hanley et al.•Medical Care•1987

  • Improving Choice of Prescribed Antibiotics Through Concurrent Reminders in an Educational Order Form

    Stephen B Soumerai, J Avorn et al.•Medical Care•1993

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae