Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Effects of Government Supervision on Quality of Integrated Diabetes Care

A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial

Bibliographic Data

ID9102156
AuthorsSandra F Oude Wesselink (Public Health Department), Hester F Lingsma (0000-0003-2063-9533, Public Health Department, corresponding author), Corry A J Ketelaars (0000-0003-0382-1296, Dutch Health Care Inspectorate), J P Mackenbach (0000-0002-8954-6557, Public Health Department, corresponding author), Paul Robben (Erasmus University Rotterdam), Paul B M Robben
Year2015
Volume53
Issue9
Pages784-791
Publication date2015-09-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueMedical Care (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948
PublisherOvid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1097/mlr.0000000000000399
PMID26225442
OpenAlexW2407952840
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited11

OBJECTIVES: The quality of integrated diabetes care is important for reducing the burden of diabetes. Therefore, we have evaluated the effect of a supervision program on the quality of integrated diabetes care in the Netherlands in the 2011-2012 period. METHODS: In this cluster RCT, the supervision program was assigned to randomly selected care groups providing care to diabetes patients. The supervision program included announcements of inspections, site visits, and sending individualized reports. Indicators of effectiveness were derived from the structures, processes, and outcomes of care. These indicators were collected from patients' files, before and after the supervision program. Hierarchical linear and logistic regression models were used to analyze data from 356 patients of 10 intervention and 8 control care groups. RESULTS: Structures and processes of care did not improve more in the intervention groups than in the control care groups. Moreover, health outcomes did not improve more in the intervention groups than in the control care groups. Although structures of care improved over time in the total population of intervention and control care groups, there were no changes in process of care or health outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: In this cluster RCT, we could not demonstrate improvements in quality of integrated diabetes care resulting from the supervision program. Although structures of care did improve over time, other quality-improvement initiatives are necessary to substantially strengthen integrated care for diabetes patients

Cluster (spacecraft) · Cluster randomised controlled trial · Control (management) · Diabetes mellitus · Environmental health · Family medicine · Health care · Integrated care · Intervention (counseling) · Logistic regression · Population · Program evaluation · Quality (philosophy) · Randomized controlled trial · Clinical practice guidelines implementation · Computer Science · Diabetes Management and Education · Interprofessional Education and Collaboration · Medicine · Nursing

  • Integrating Primary and Secondary Care to Enhance Chronic Disease Management

    Open Access•Sara Murtagh, Geoff McCombe et al.•International Journal of…•2021

  • Nursing Care Coordination for Patients with Complex Needs in Primary Healthcare

    Open Access•Marlène Karam, Maud-Christine Chouinard et al.•International Journal of…•2021

  • Developing and evaluating complex interventions

    Open Access•Peter Craig, Paul Dieppe et al.•International Journal of Nursing…•2013

  • The Evaluation of Public Service Inspection

    Open Access•George A Boyne, George Boyne et al.•Urban Studies•2002

Citations per year0.4
Citation span2021 - 2021 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae