Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Economic Differences in Direct and Indirect Costs Between People With Epilepsy and Without Epilepsy

Datos Bibliográficos

ID9102311
AutoresAnne M Libby (0000-0002-4564-9407, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, autor de correspondencia), Vahram Ghushchyan (University of Montana, autor de correspondencia), R Brett McQueen (0000-0002-4302-2678, University of Montana, autor de correspondencia), Julia F Slejko (0000-0001-6900-9220, University of Montana, autor de correspondencia), Jacqueline L Bainbridge (University of Colorado Denver), Jonathan D Campbell (0000-0001-6539-1258, University of Colorado Denver, autor de correspondencia)
Año2012
Volumen50
Número11
Páginas928-933
Fecha de publicación2012-11-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaMedical Care (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948
EditorialOvid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1097/mlr.0b013e31826c8613
PMID23047781
OpenAlexW1963832760
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas2
Referencias citadas19

OBJECTIVE: To provide generalizable estimates of economic burden in epilepsy and nonepilepsy populations and a comprehensive accounting for employment-based lost productivity associated with epilepsy in current US health care systems as compared with other chronic diseases. RESEARCH DESIGN: We use the nationally representative data source (Medical Expenditure Panel Survey) from 1998 to 2009 to create a retrospective cohort of people diagnosed with epilepsy by a health professional and a comparison cohort of people with no epilepsy. MEASURES: Health care utilization and direct costs for all components of treatment, including prescription medications, wages, employment, educational attainment, family income, and lost productivity were outcomes. RESULTS: We observed economic disparities associated with epilepsy in the United States despite high rates of modern treatments (89% on anticonvulsant therapies). Only 42% of the people with epilepsy over age 18 reported employment compared with 70% of people with no epilepsy; among those, people with epilepsy reported missing an average of 12 days of work because of illness or injury as compared with 4 days in the nonepilepsy cohort. Holding other variables constant, people with epilepsy had a loss of productivity of $9504 in 2011 dollars compared with people with no epilepsy. In comparison, diabetes was associated with annual average lost productivity valued at $3358 and depression at $3182. CONCLUSIONS: Lost wage-based productivity associated with epilepsy was nearly equal to combined wage losses associated with diabetes, depression, anxiety, and asthma together. To evaluate societal burden of illness, results illustrate the importance of indirect costs in addition to treated prevalence and direct medical costs

Anxiety · Business · Cohort · Cohort study · Depression (economics) · Economics · Epilepsy · Health care · Indirect costs · Medical Expenditure Panel Survey · Medical prescription · Productivity · Psychiatry · Diet and metabolism studies · Epilepsy research and treatment · Medicine · Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy

  • Post-Hurricane Distress Scale (PHDS)

    Open Access•Yonatan Carl, Andy Vega et al.•International Journal of…•2022

  • The social costs of child abuse in Japan

    Open Access•Ichiro Wada, Ataru Igarashi•Children and Youth Services Review•2014

Obras citantes distintas2
Citas por año0,17
Intervalo de citas2014 - 2022 (9)
Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 2
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae