Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Estimation of Excess Risk of Readmission to Hospital After an Index Inpatient Separation

Datos Bibliográficos

ID9102447
AutoresKate J Brameld, Kate Brameld (0000-0002-1239-3994, The University of Western Australia, autor de correspondencia), C D’arcy J Holman
Año2003
Volumen41
Número5
Páginas693-697
Fecha de publicación2003-05-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaMedical Care (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948
EditorialOvid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1097/01.mlr.0000062681.15056.8d
PMID12719694
OpenAlexW2023791951
IdiomaEN
Referencias citadas8

OBJECTIVES: To develop methods to measure excess risk of readmission following an index admission using linked administrative health data. RESEARCH DESIGN: The cumulative risk of readmission following an index admission was calculated for index and reference subjects using linked hospital morbidity, death, and electoral roll data in cohort, cohort-crossover, and cohort-comparison-crossover designs. SUBJECTS: Index subjects were defined as any man age 20 years or older who separated from an acute hospital in Western Australia in 1990 to 1995 following any form of prostatectomy for a principal diagnosis of benign prostatic hypertrophy. Reference subjects were selected from the general population and the electoral roll (cohort designs). Cases were also used as their own historical controls (cohort-crossover) with and without adjustment for background time difference (cohort-comparison-crossover). MEASURES: The excess risk of readmission following an index admission was estimated by calculating the cumulative risk of readmission in index subjects and subtracting the background risk of admission. The background risk calculation varied according to the study design. RESULTS: The risk of readmission at 30 days increased by 241 to 328% following the procedure. After 1 year of follow-up, the risk of readmission was still increased by 58 to 108%. In general, the absolute differences between index and reference subjects decrease or remain the same with increasing rigor of the methods. CONCLUSIONS: In this example, there was little difference between the cohort-crossover and the cohort-comparison-crossover designs, suggesting that the cohort-crossover method is a justifiable method in the absence of electoral roll controls

Absolute risk reduction · Cohort · Cohort study · Confidence interval · Crossover study · Environmental health · Population · Risk assessment · Advanced Causal Inference Techniques · Emergency Medicine · Heart Failure Treatment and Management · Internal Medicine · Medicine · Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference

  • An Evaluation of Generic Screens for Poor Quality of Hospital Care on a General Medicine Service

    Rodney A Hayward, Annette M Bernard et al.•Medical Care•1993

  • Evaluating Hospital Discharge Planning

    Ron L Evans, Robert D Hendricks•Medical Care•1993

  • The Association Between the Quality of Inpatient Care and Early Readmission

    Carol M Ashton, Carol M Ashton Carol M Ashton et al.•Medical Care•1997

Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae