Cross-Cultural Differences in the Reporting of Global Functional Capacity

OBJECTIVES: Patient-based health status measures have an important role to play in the assessment of health care outcomes. Among these measures, global assessments increasingly have been used, although the understanding of the performance of these indicators and the determinants of patients responses is underdeveloped. In this study, the performance of a single-item global indicator of visual function in cataract patients of four international settings was compared. METHODS: Visual acuity and ocular comorbidity was assessed by patients' ophthalmologist using Snellen-type charts in patients referred for a first cataract surgery in the United States, Manitoba (Canada), Denmark, and Barcelona (Spain). Patients also were interviewed by telephone and asked to report overall trouble with vision on a single-item indicator ("great deal," "moderate," "a little," "none") and to complete the Visual Functioning Index (VF-14), a scale of visual function ranging from 0 (worst function) to 100 (best level of function), along with other questions including the degree the patient was bothered by symptoms as measured by the Cataract Symptom Score (CSS). A total of 1,407 patients completed the clinical examination and the preoperative interview. RESULTS: Distribution of overall trouble with vision varied across the sites, with the proportion of patients reporting a great deal of trouble ranging from 21.7% to 37.9%. In all sites, patients reporting more trouble with vision tended to show a poorer age-adjusted and sex-adjusted visual acuity. The proportion of patients reporting great deal of trouble with vision was higher in the groups with worse visual acuity (P < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, after controlling for clinical and sociodemographic factors, the patients from Manitoba (OR = 0.32, 95% CI = 0.20, 0.51) and those from Barcelona (OR = 0.33, 95% CI = 0.20, 0.56) were less likely to report a great deal of trouble with their vision (P < 0.01) than the Danish and US patients. No such differences were found among the US patients from three sites. CONCLUSIONS: There is international variation in the self-reporting of global vision-related functional capacity that is not explained by clinical or sociodemographic factors, which may be because of cultural differences. International comparisons of patient-based health outcomes should not rely only on single-item indicators until there is convincing evidence of their cross-cultural equivalence

Comorbidity · Psychiatry · Telephone interview · Visual acuity · Visual impairment · Connexins and lens biology · Medicine · Ophthalmology · Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies · Retinal Diseases and Treatments · Optometry

• Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation, and Validation of Measurement Instruments

  Open Access•Paulo Cruchinho, María Dolores López-Franco et al.•Journal of Multidisciplinary…•2024

  Incluir item

• Lost in Translation

  Open Access•Elizabeth D Peña•Child Development•2007

  Incluir item

• An exploration of differences between Japan and two European countries in the self-reporting and valuation of pain and discomfort on the EQ-5D

  Open Access•Yan Feng, Mike Herdman et al.•Quality of Life Research•2017

  Incluir item

• Coping, resilience and posttraumatic growth among Eritrean female refugees living in Norwegian asylum reception centres

  Open Access•Ruth Abraham, Lars Lien et al.•International Journal of Social…•2018

  Incluir item

• An English and Spanish Pediatric Asthma Symptom Scale

  Marielena Lara, Cathy D Sherbourne et al.•Medical Care•2000

  Incluir item

• Validity of the Spanish Version of the Child Health and Illness Profile???Adolescent Edition (CHIP-AE)

  Luis Rajmil, Vicky Serra-Sutton et al.•Medical Care•2003

  Incluir item

• Symptom onset and the socially sanctioned pathway

  Open Access•Jane Ogden•Health An Interdisciplinary…•2007

  Incluir item

• Perceived Health and Mortality

  George A Kaplan, Terry Camacho•American Journal of Epidemiology•1983

  Incluir item

• Reproducibility and responsiveness of health status measures statistics and strategies for evaluation

  Open Access•Richard A Deyo, Paula Diehr et al.•Controlled Clinical Trials•1991

  Incluir item

• Measuring change over time

  Open Access•Gordon Guyatt, Gordon Guaytt et al.•Journal of Chronic Diseases•1987

  Incluir item

• Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures

  Open Access•Francis Guillemin, Claire Bombardier et al.•Journal of Clinical Epidemiology•1993

  Incluir item

• A Critical Appraisal of the Quality of Quality-of-Life Measurements

  Thomas M Gill•JAMA•1994

  Incluir item

• A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases.

  J A Hanley, Barbara J Mcneil•Radiology•1983

  Incluir item

• Culture, Health and Illness

  Bashir Qureshi, C G Helman et al.•Culture, health, and illness•1984

  Incluir item

• Self-rated health

  Jana Mossey, J M Mossey et al.•American Journal of Public Health•1982

  Incluir item

• Pitfalls in measuring the health status of Mexican Americans

  Richard A Deyo•American Journal of Public Health•1984

  Incluir item

• Health Perceptions of Primary Care Patients and the Influence on Health Care Utilization

  Julia E Connelly, John T Philbrick et al.•Medical Care•1989

  Incluir item

• Sociodemographic Factors and the Use of Outpatient Mental Health Services

  Kenneth B Wells, Willard G Manning et al.•Medical Care•1986

  Incluir item

• What Do Global Self-Rated Health Items Measure

  N Krause, Neal M Krause et al.•Medical Care•1994

  Incluir item

• Responsiveness of a Single-Item Indicator Versus a Multi-Item Scale

  CHRISTOPH HÜRNY, JÜRG BERNHARD et al.•Medical Care•1996

  Incluir item

• Variation and Quality of Self-Report Health Data

  Lisa S Meredith, Albert L Siu•Medical Care•1995

  Incluir item

• Analyzing Health Outcomes Through International Comparisons

  Gerald F Anderson, Gerard F Anderson et al.•Medical Care•1994

  Incluir item

• Assessing the Health of the Nation

  Marthe R Gold, Marthe Gold et al.•Medical Care•1996

  Incluir item

• Patients' acceptance of waiting for cataract surgery

  Open Access•Elaine Dunn, Charlyn Black et al.•Social Science & Medicine•1997

  Incluir item

• The disablement process

  Open Access•Lois M Verbrugge, Alan M Jette•Social Science & Medicine•1994

  Incluir item

• Back-Translation for Cross-Cultural Research

  Open Access•Richard W Brislin•Journal of Cross-Cultural…•1970

  Incluir item