A Cost Benefit Analysis of Continued Stay Certification
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9102473 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Richard F Averill, Laurence F McMahon (0000-0001-6625-3594) |
| Year | 1977 |
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 158-173 |
| Publication date | 1977-02-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Medical Care (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948 |
| Publisher | Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1097/00005650-197702000-00005 |
| PMID | 402513 |
| OpenAlex | W2038279228 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
A large portion of the resources of the Professional Standards Review Organization Program have been directed toward the review of inpatients to determine their need for continued hospitalization. The primary goal of this review process is the containment of hospital costs through the elimination of unnecessary patient hospitalization. A cost benefit analysis of this review process shows that the potential financial savings accrued are unlikely to offset the costs associated with the review procedure
Actuarial science · Business · Certification · Cost analysis · Cost–benefit analysis · Economics · Health care · Medical emergency · MEDLINE · Operations management · Operations research · Process (computing) · Risk analysis (engineering) · Utilization review · Computer Science · Engineering · Healthcare Policy and Management · Hospital Admissions and Outcomes · Medicine · Primary Care and Health Outcomes
The Relationship between Diagnostic Information Available at Admission and Discharge for Patients in One PSRO Setting
Optimal Investigation Policies Under Selected PSRO Procedures
Variation in Resource Use Within Diagnosis-related Groups
The Effect of Concurrent Feedback in Reducing Inappropriate Hospital Utilization
Deviance among professionals
| Unique citing works | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,11 |
| Citation span | 1979 - 1986 (8) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |