Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Association of Receipt of Systemic Treatment for Melanoma With Insurance Type in North Carolina

Bibliographic Data

ID9102516
AuthorsAdewole S Adamson (0000-0002-1493-1776, Department of Internal Medicine, Dell Medical School, corresponding author), Bradford E Jackson (0000-0003-0950-2907, UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center), Christopher D Baggett (UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center), Nancy E Thomas (0000-0002-2230-1328, Department of Dermatology), Alex B Haynes (0000-0002-5731-329X, LIVESTRONG Cancer Institutes, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX), Michael Pignone (0000-0002-6657-7342, Livestrong Foundation, corresponding author), Michael P Pignone (Department of Internal Medicine, Dell Medical School)
Year2023
Volume61
Issue12
Pages829-835
Publication date2023-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueMedical Care (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948
PublisherOvid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1097/mlr.0000000000001921
PMID37708348
OpenAlexW4386728789
LanguageEN
References cited24

BACKGROUND: Previous studies of hospital-based patients with metastatic melanoma suggest sociodemographic factors, including insurance type, may be associated with the receipt of systemic treatments. OBJECTIVES: To examine whether insurance type is associated with the receipt of systemic treatment among patients with melanoma in a broad cohort of patients in North Carolina. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study between 2011 and 2017 of patients with stages III-IV melanoma using data from the North Carolina Central Cancer Registry linked to Medicare, Medicaid, and private health insurance claims across the state. The primary outcome was the receipt of any systemic treatment, and the secondary outcome was the receipt of immunotherapy. RESULTS: A total of 372 patients met the inclusion criteria. The average age was 68 years old (interquartile range: 56-76) and 61% were male. Within the cohort 48% had Medicare only, 29% had private insurance, 12% had both Medicare and Medicaid, and 11% had Medicaid only. A total of 186 (50%) patients received systemic treatment for melanoma, 125 (67%) of whom received immunotherapy. The use of systemic therapy, including immunotherapy, increased significantly over time. Having Medicaid-only insurance was independently associated with a 45% lower likelihood of receiving any systemic treatment [0.55 (95% CI: 0.35, 0.85)] and a 43% lower likelihood of receipt of immunotherapy [0.57 (95% CI: 0.34, 0.95)] compared with private insurance. CONCLUSIONS: Stage III-IV melanoma patients with Medicaid-only insurance were less likely to receive systemic therapy or immunotherapy than patients with private insurance or Medicare insurance. This finding raises concerns about insurance-based disparities in treatment access

Breast cancer · Cancer · Cancer registry · Cohort · Cohort study · Family medicine · Health care · Interquartile range · Medicaid · Receipt · Retrospective cohort study · Systemic therapy · Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers · Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management · Demography · Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer · Emergency Medicine · Internal Medicine · Medicine

  • Cancer statistics, 2020

    Open Access•Rebecca L Siegel, Kimberly D Miller et al.•CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians•2020

  • Racial and Ethnic Disparities in the Receipt of Cancer Treatment

    Vickie L Shavers•CancerSpectrum Knowledge…•2002

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae