Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

A Comparison of Health Risk and Costs Across Private Insurance Markets

Bibliographic Data

ID9102564
AuthorsBrett Lissenden (0000-0001-7514-6037, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, corresponding author), Krutika Amin (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, CCIIO, Baltimore, MD), Kelly Drury (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, CCIIO, Baltimore, MD), Gregory C Pope (0000-0003-2274-7095, RTI International, Waltham, MA), John Kautter (0000-0002-2530-4727, RTI International, Waltham, MA), Erin Sutton (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, CCIIO, Baltimore, MD), Yolanda Peele (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, CCIIO, Baltimore, MD)
Year2020
Volume58
Issue2
Pages146-153
Publication date2020-02-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueMedical Care (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948
PublisherOvid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1097/mlr.0000000000001239
PMID31688571
OpenAlexW2987599600
LanguageEN
References cited10

BACKGROUND: The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) established new parameters for the individual and small group health insurance markets starting in 2014. We study these 2 reformed markets by comparing health risk and costs to the more mature large employer market. STUDY DATA: For 2017, claims data for all enrollees in PPACA-compliant individual and small group market plans as well as claims data from a sample of large employer market enrollees. VARIABLES AND METHODOLOGY: Risk scores and total (unadjusted and risk-adjusted) per-member-per-month (PMPM) allowed charges. Differences across markets in enrollment duration, age, and geographic distribution are addressed. The analysis is descriptive. RESULTS: Compared with large employer market enrollees, health risk was 3% lower among PPACA small group market enrollees and 20% higher among PPACA individual market enrollees. After adjusting for differences in health risk, enrollees in the PPACA individual market had 27% lower PMPM allowed charges than enrollees in the large employer market and enrollees in the PPACA small group market had 12% lower PMPM allowed charges than enrollees in the large employer market. CONCLUSIONS: On average, the PPACA individual market enrolls sicker individuals than the 2 group markets. But this does not translate to higher health costs; in fact, enrollees in the PPACA individual market accumulate lower allowed charges than enrollees in the large employer market. Lower-income enrollees particularly accumulate lower allowed charges. Narrower networks and increased enrollee cost-sharing among individual market plans, though they may reduce the value of coverage, likely significantly reduce allowed charges

Actuarial science · Business · Economic growth · Economics · Health care · Health insurance · Managed care · Market share · Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act · Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer · Finance · Healthcare Policy and Management · Healthcare Systems and Reforms

  • The Oregon Health Insurance Experiment

    Amy Finkelstein, Sarah Taubman et al.•The Quarterly Journal of Economics•2012

  • A Review on Methods of Risk Adjustment and their Use in Integrated Healthcare Systems

    Open Access•Christin Juhnke, Susanne Bethge et al.•International Journal of…•2016

  • A Comparison of Medical Birth Register Outcomes between Maternity Health Clinics and Integrated Maternity and Child Health Clinics in Southwest Finland

    Open Access•Miia Tuominen, Anne Kaljonen et al.•International Journal of…•2016

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae