Tailoring of Outpatient Substance Abuse Treatment to Women, 1995–2005
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9102701 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Cynthia I Campbell (0000-0003-1019-5852, Kaiser Permanente, corresponding author), Rebecca Wells (0000-0002-1526-3263, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill), Jeffrey A Alexander (0000-0003-0872-7936, University of Michigan), Lan Jiang (0000-0002-4097-1341, Providence VA Medical Center), Tammie A Nahra (University of Michigan), Christy Harris Lemak (University of Florida) |
| Year | 2007 |
| Volume | 45 |
| Issue | 8 |
| Pages | 775-780 |
| Publication date | 2007-08-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Medical Care (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948 |
| Publisher | Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1097/mlr.0b013e31806518c0 |
| PMID | 17667312 |
| OpenAlex | W1964845536 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
| References cited | 31 |
BACKGROUND: Tailoring substance abuse treatment to women often leads to better outcomes. Previous evidence, however, suggests limited availability of such options. OBJECTIVES: This investigation sought to depict recent changes in outpatient substance abuse treatment (OSAT) tailoring to women and to identify unit and contextual factors associated with these practices. RESEARCH DESIGN: Data were from 2 waves of a national OSAT unit survey (N = 618 in 1995, N = 566 in 2005). Comparisons of weighted means between waves indicate which practices changed over time. Multiple logistic regressions with generalized estimating equations test associations between unit and contextual attributes and tailoring to women. MEASURES: Tailoring to women was measured as availability of prenatal care, child care, single sex therapy, and same sex therapists, and the percentage of staff trained to meet female clients' needs. RESULTS: Two measures of tailoring to women declined significantly between 1995 and 2005: availability of single sex therapy (from 66% to 44% of units) and percent of staff trained to work with women (from 42% to 32% of units). No aspect of tailoring to women became more common. Proportion of female clients, total number of clients, methadone status, and private and government managed care were associated with higher odds of tailoring to women. For-profit facilities, which became more prevalent during the study period, had lower odds than other units of tailoring treatment to women. CONCLUSIONS: Some key aspects of OSAT tailoring to women decreased significantly in the last decade. Managed care contracts may offer 1 mechanism for counteracting these trends
Psychiatry · Substance abuse · Substance abuse treatment · Medicine · Opioid Use Disorder Treatment · Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects · Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Alcohol abuse recovery through the lens of Manitoban First Nations and Aboriginal women
Special Services for Women in Substance Use Disorders Treatment
From Generic to Gender-Responsive Treatment
Effect of an integrated family dependency treatment court on child welfare reunification, time to permanency and re-entry rates
Mixed-Gender Shelter-Based Service for Child Survivors of Commercial Sexual Exploitation (CSEC) in Italy
Treatment Issues for Alcohol- and Drug-Dependent Pregnant and Parenting Women
Effectiveness Of Substance Abuse Treatment Programming For Women
Increasing access and providing social services to improve drug abuse treatment for women with children
Substance abuse treatment entry, retention, and outcome in women
Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models
Services for Perinatal Women with Substance Abuse and Mental Health Disorders
A Therapeutic Community for Substance-Abusing Pregnant Women and Women with Children
Challenges in Motivating Treatment Enrollment in Community Syringe Exchange Participants
The Effects of Managed Care on Administrative Burden in Outpatient Substance Abuse Treatment Facilities
Women with Jagged Edges
Why Do Drug Treatment Organizations Use Contingent Staffing Arrangements? An Analysis of Market and Social Influences
| Unique citing works | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,28 |
| Citation span | 2008 - 2017 (10) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 5 |