Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Impact of Underuse, Overuse, and Discretionary Use on Geographic Variation in the Use of Coronary Angiography After Acute Myocardial Infarction

Dados Bibliográficos

ID9102706
AutoresEdward Guadagnoli (Harvard University, autor correspondente), Mary Beth Landrum (0000-0001-5055-8473, Harvard University), Sharon‐Lise T Normand (0000-0001-7027-4769, Harvard University, autor correspondente), Sharon-Lise T Normand, John Z Ayanian (Brigham and Women's Hospital, autor correspondente), Pushkal Garg (Brigham and Women's Hospital, autor correspondente), Paul J Hauptman (0000-0002-9044-5614), Thomas J Ryan (0000-0002-7666-380X), Barbara J Mcneil (Harvard University, autor correspondente)
Ano2001
Volume39
Fascículo5
Páginas446-458
Data de publicação2001-05-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessNão
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoMedical Care (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948
EditoraOvid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1097/00005650-200105000-00005
PMID11317093
OpenAlexW2014367107
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas8
Referências citadas34

BACKGROUND: Geographic variation in the use of medical procedures has been well documented. However, it is not known whether this variation is due to differences in use when procedures are indicated, discretionary, or contraindicated. OBJECTIVES: To examine whether use of coronary angiography after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) according to appropriateness criteria varied across geographic regions and whether underuse, overuse, or discretionary use accounted for variation in overall use. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study using data from the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project. SETTING: Ninety-five hospital referral regions. PATIENTS: There were 44,294 Medicare patients hospitalized with AMI during 1994 or 1995, classified according to appropriateness for angiography. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Variation in use of angiography, as measured by the difference between high and low rates of use across regions. RESULTS: Across regions, variation in the use of angiography was similar for indications judged necessary; appropriate, but not necessary; or uncertain. Variation was lowest for indications judged unsuitable (difference between high rate and low rate across regions = 16.3%; 95% CI = 12.6%; 20.6%). The primary cause of variation in the overall rate of angiography was due to use for indications judged appropriate, but not necessary or uncertain. When variation associated with these indications was accounted for, the difference between the resulting high and low overall rates was 10.8% (9.4%, 12.4%). In contrast, variation in the overall rate remained high when underuse in necessary situations or overuse in unsuitable situations was accounted for. CONCLUSIONS: Across regions, practice was more similar for patients categorized unsuitable for angiography than for patients with other indications. Variation in overall use of angiography appeared to be driven by utilization for discretionary indications rather than by underuse or overuse. If equivalent rates across geographic areas are judged desirable, then greater effort must be directed toward defining care for patients with discretionary indications

Angiography · Cardiology · Cohort · Coronary angiography · Geographic variation · Myocardial infarction · Population · Referral · Retrospective cohort study · Variation (astronomy) · Acute Myocardial Infarction Research · Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics · Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies · Internal Medicine · Medicine

  • Access to myocardial revascularization procedures

    Open Access•Alain Vanasse, Theo Niyonsenga et al.•BMC Public Health•2006

  • Education-related variation in coronary procedure rates and the contribution of private health care in Australia

    Open Access•Veronica S Hughes, Veronica Hughes et al.•International Journal for Equity…•2020

  • Understanding Individual and Small Area Variation in the Underuse of Coronary Angiography Following Acute Myocardial Infarction

    Pushkal P Garg, Pushkal Garg et al.•Medical Care•2002

  • Does the Ownership of the Admitting Hospital Make a Difference

    Frank A Sloan, Justin G Trogdon et al.•Medical Care•2003

  • Does More “Appropriateness” Explain Higher Rates of Cardiac Procedures Among Patients Hospitalized With Coronary Heart Disease

    Joseph D Restuccia, Michael Shwartz et al.•Medical Care•2002

  • Hospital Phenotypes in the Management of Patients Admitted for Acute Myocardial Infarction

    Xiao Xu, Shu-Xia Li et al.•Medical Care•2016

  • The Relationship Between Geographic Variations and Overuse of Healthcare Services

    Salomeh Keyhani, Raphael Falk et al.•Medical Care•2012

  • Race and Gender Disparities in Rates of Cardiac Revascularization

    Arnold M Epstein, Joel S Weissman et al.•Medical Care•2003

  • Validating recommendations for coronary angiography following acute myocardial infarction in the elderly

    Open Access•Sharon‐Lise T Normand, Sharon-Lise T Normand et al.•Journal of Clinical Epidemiology•2001

  • Variations in the Utilization of Coronary Angiography for Elderly Patients with an Acute Myocardial Infarction

    Constantine Gatsonis, Constantine A Gatsonis et al.•Medical Care•1995

  • Measuring the Necessity of Medical Procedures

    James P Kahan, STEVEN J BERNSTEIN et al.•Medical Care•1994

Obras citantes distintas8
Citações por ano0,33
Intervalo de citações2002 - 2020 (19)
Velocidade de citaçãohistorical
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 8
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae