Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Five-step Methodology for Evaluation and Adaptation of Print Patient Health Information to Meet the <5th Grade Readability Criterion

Bibliographic Data

ID9102739
AuthorsFelicia Hill-Briggs, Felicia Hill‐Briggs (0000-0002-2804-3278, Johns Hopkins University, corresponding author), Kristina P Schumann (Johns Hopkins University), Ogechi Dike, Ogechi N Dike (Johnson University)
Year2012
Volume50
Issue4
Pages294-301
Publication date2012-04-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueMedical Care (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948
PublisherOvid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1097/mlr.0b013e318249d6c8
PMID22354210
PMCIDPMC3318988
OpenAlexW2167615766
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited14

BACKGROUND: In the setting of declining U.S. literacy, new policies include use of clear communication and low-literacy accessibility practices with all patients. Reliable methods for adapting health information to meet such criteria remain a pressing need. OBJECTIVES: To report method validation (study 1) and method replication (study 2) procedures and outcomes for a 5-step method for evaluating and adapting print health information to meet the current low-literacy criterion of 2-3 syllables) minimized or avoided. Interrater reliability for the document evaluations was determined. RESULTS: Training in the methodology resulted in interrater reliability of 0.99-1.00 in study 1 and 0.98-1.00 in study 2. Original documents met none of the targeted low literacy criteria. In study 1, following low-literacy adaptation, mean reading grade level decreased from 10.4±1.8 to 3.8±0.6 (P<0.0001), with consistent achievement of criteria for words per sentence, passive voice, and syllables per word. Study 2 demonstrated similar achievement of all target criteria, with a resulting decrease in mean reading grade level from 11.0±1.8 to 4.6±0.3 (P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The 5-step methodology proved teachable and efficient. Targeting a limited set of modifiable criteria was effective and reliable in achieving <5th grade readability

Adaptation (eye) · Grade level · Health care · Health literacy · Inter-rater reliability · Linguistics · Literacy · Mathematics education · Medical education · Natural language processing · Pedagogy · Readability · Reading (process) · Reliability (semiconductor) · Sentence · Applied Psychology · Computer Science · Health Literacy and Information Accessibility · Medicine · Psychology · Reading and Literacy Development · Text Readability and Simplification

  • Developing and Testing Automatic Models of Patient Communicative Health Literacy Using Linguistic Features

    Scott A Crossley, Renu Balyan et al.•Health Communication•2021

  • Social Determinants of Health and Diabetes

    Open Access•Felicia Hill-Briggs, Felicia Hill‐Briggs et al.•Diabetes Care•2021

  • Gibberish in Communicating Written Physical Activity Information

    Jafrā D Thomas, Bradley J Cardinal•Sociology of Sport Journal•2017

  • Relationship of Functional Health Literacy to Patients' Knowledge of Their Chronic Disease

    Malcolm V Williams, Mark V Williams et al.•A.M.A. Archives of Internal…•1998

  • Literacy and health outcomes

    Darren A Dewalt, Nancy D Berkman et al.•Journal of General Internal…•2004

  • Association of Health Literacy With Diabetes Outcomes

    Dean Schillinger•JAMA•2002

  • The relationship of patient reading ability to self-reported health and use of health services

    David W Baker, Ruth M Parker et al.•American Journal of Public Health•1997

Citations per year0.33
Citation span2017 - 2021 (5)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae