Cancer-Related Financial Hardship Screening as Part of Practice Transformation
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9102770 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Courtney P Williams (0000-0001-5351-6340, University of Alabama at Birmingham), Courtney Williams (0000-0001-5328-7517, University of Alabama at Birmingham, corresponding author), Margaret I Liang (Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles), Margaret Liang (0000-0001-9229-5181, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center), Gabrielle B Rocque (0000-0003-4188-9785, University of Alabama at Birmingham, corresponding author), Risha Gidwani (0000-0002-3548-2332, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica), Nicole E Caston (0000-0001-7474-6110, University of Alabama at Birmingham, corresponding author), Maria Pisu (University of Alabama at Birmingham, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 61 |
| Issue | 12 |
| Pages | S116-S121 |
| Publication date | 2023-12-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Medical Care (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948 |
| Publisher | Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1097/mlr.0000000000001910 |
| PMID | 37963030 |
| OpenAlex | W4388668546 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 22 |
BACKGROUND: Data on financial hardship, an "adverse event" in individuals with cancer, are needed to inform policy and supportive care interventions and reduce adverse economic outcomes. METHODS: Lay navigator-led financial hardship screening was piloted among University of Alabama at Birmingham oncology patients initiating treatment in October 2020. Financial hardship screening, including reported financial distress and difficulty, was added to a standard-of-care treatment planning survey. Screening feasibility and completion and proportions of reported financial distress and difficulty were calculated overall and by patient race and rurality. The risk of financial distress by patient sociodemographics was estimated. RESULTS: Patients who completed a treatment planning survey (N=2741) were 18% Black, Indigenous, or persons of color (BIPOC) and 16% rural dwelling. The majority of patients completed financial hardship screening (90%), surpassing the target feasibility completion rate of 75%. The screening revealed 34% of patients were experiencing financial distress, including 49% of BIPOC and 30% of White patients. Adjusted models revealed BIPOC patients had a 48% higher risk of financial distress compared with those who were White (risk ratio 1.48, 95% CI, 1.31-1.66). Large differences in reported financial difficulties were seen comparing patients who were BIPOC and White (utilities: 33% vs. 10%, upfront medical payments: 44% vs. 23%, transportation: 28% vs. 12%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The collection of patient-reported financial hardship data via routine clinical care was feasible and identified racial inequities at treatment initiation. Efforts to collect patient economic data should support the design, implementation, and evaluation of patient-centered interventions to improve equity and reduce the impact of financial hardship
Business · Distress · Family medicine · Financial distress · Psychiatry · Psychological intervention · Rural area · Rurality · Clinical Psychology · Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer · Emergency Medicine · Finance · Healthcare Policy and Management · Medication Adherence and Compliance · Medicine
| Citations per year | 0.33 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2023 - 2023 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |