Quality Improvement Strategies for Hypertension Management

A Systematic Review

Bibliographic Data

ID9103205
AuthorsJudith M E Walsh (0000-0002-0148-3169, University of California, San Francisco, corresponding author), Kathryn M McDonald (0000-0002-4049-5744, Stanford University), Kaveh G Shojania (0000-0002-9942-0130, University of Ottawa), Vandana Sundaram (0000-0001-5548-5859, VA Palo Alto Health Care System), Smita Nayak (0000-0002-0328-6492, VA Palo Alto Health Care System), Robyn Lewis (0000-0002-8147-1650, Stanford University), Douglas K Owens (VA Palo Alto Health Care System), Mary K Goldstein (0000-0001-7256-5746, Stanford University)
Year2006
Volume44
Issue7
Pages646-657
Publication date2006-07-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueMedical Care (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948
PublisherOvid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1097/01.mlr.0000220260.30768.32
PMID16799359
OpenAlexW2068129753
LanguageEN
Citations received18
References cited59

BACKGROUND: Care remains suboptimal for many patients with hypertension. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of quality improvement (QI) strategies in lowering blood pressure. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Cochrane databases, and article bibliographies were searched for this study. STUDY SELECTION: Trials, controlled before-after studies, and interrupted time series evaluating QI interventions targeting hypertension control and reporting blood pressure outcomes were studied. DATA EXTRACTION: Two reviewers abstracted data and classified QI strategies into categories: provider education, provider reminders, facilitated relay of clinical information, patient education, self-management, patient reminders, audit and feedback, team change, or financial incentives were extracted. DATA SYNTHESIS: Forty-four articles reporting 57 comparisons underwent quantitative analysis. Patients in the intervention groups experienced median reductions in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) that were 4.5 mm Hg (interquartile range [IQR]: 1.5 to 11.0) and 2.1 mm Hg (IQR: -0.2 to 5.0) greater than observed for control patients. Median increases in the percentage of individuals achieving target goals for SBP and DBP were 16.2% (IQR: 10.3 to 32.2) and 6.0% (IQR: 1.5 to 17.5). Interventions that included team change as a QI strategy were associated with the largest reductions in blood pressure outcomes. All team change studies included assignment of some responsibilities to a health professional other than the patient's physician. LIMITATIONS: Not all QI strategies have been assessed equally, which limits the power to compare differences in effects between strategies. CONCLUSION: QI strategies are associated with improved hypertension control. A focus on hypertension by someone in addition to the patient's physician was associated with substantial improvement. Future research should examine the contributions of individual QI strategies and their relative costs

Blood pressure · Data extraction · Interquartile range · MEDLINE · Physical therapy · Psychological intervention · Quality management · Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies · Emergency Medicine · Health Policy Implementation Science · Internal Medicine · Medicine · Nursing · Primary Care and Health Outcomes

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub