Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Does Physician Performance Explain Interspecialty Differences in Malpractice Claim Rates

Bibliographic Data

ID9103285
AuthorsMark I Taragin (0000-0002-8649-7630, corresponding author), Frank A Sonnenberg (0000-0003-0132-7307, Johnson University, corresponding author), Elizabeth Karns (Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey), Richard Trout (Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey), Sharona Shapiro (Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, corresponding author), Jeffrey L Carson (0000-0001-5466-2833, Johnson University, corresponding author)
Year1994
Volume32
Issue7
Pages661-667
Publication date1994-07-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueMedical Care (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948
PublisherOvid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1097/00005650-199407000-00001
PMID8028402
OpenAlexW2073790279
LanguageEN
Citations received2

Physician specialty has been consistently associated with different malpractice claim rates, with neurosurgery, orthopedics, and obstetrics and gynecology having the highest rates. Whether these differences reflect physician performance or other aspects of patient care that are unique for each specialty is unclear. A retrospective cohort study was performed including 12,829 physicians involved in 8,221 closed cases from 1977 to 1991. For each case an assessment was made whether the plaintiff received an award and whether the physician care of the patient was indefensible. An award was made to the plaintiff in 42% of cases. Physician care was considered indefensible in 23% of the cases. The specialties with the highest award rates were anesthesiology (58.3%), obstetrics and gynecology (47.5%), and radiology (43.0%). Neurosurgery had the lowest rate of award (30.2%). The specialties with the highest indefensibility rates were radiology (36%), obstetrics and gynecology (27%), and anesthesiology (27%). Neurosurgery had the lowest indefensibility rate (10%). These results were unchanged after controlling for physician age, degree, site of training, certification status, and severity of patient injury. In conclusion, differences in award rate and indefensibility are present, but not large enough to explain the large variation in specialty claim rates. This suggests that the variation in malpractice rates results from factors other than a meaningful difference in physician performance

Anesthesia · Anesthesiology · Certification · Family medicine · Malpractice · Neurosurgery · Obstetrics and gynaecology · Orthopedic surgery · Plaintiff · Pregnancy · Retrospective cohort study · Specialty · Healthcare cost, quality, practices · Healthcare Policy and Management · Internal Medicine · Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues · Medicine · Surgery

  • Impact of the National Practitioner Data Bank on Resolution of Malpractice Claims

    Open Access•Teresa M Waters, David M Studdert et al.•INQUIRY The Journal of Health…•2003

  • Layperson and physician perceptions of the malpractice system

    Open Access•Bryan A Liang•Social Science & Medicine•2003

Citations per year0.09
Citation span2003 - 2003 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae