Association of Physician and Hospital Volume With Use of Aspirin and Reperfusion Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 9103412 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Donald J Willison (0000-0002-2848-3791, St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton, autor de correspondencia), Stephen B Soumerai (0000-0001-6811-2496), R Heather Palmer |
| Año | 2000 |
| Volumen | 38 |
| Número | 11 |
| Páginas | 1092-1102 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2000-11-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Medical Care (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948 |
| Editorial | Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1097/00005650-200011000-00004 |
| PMID | 11078050 |
| OpenAlex | W2049080933 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 5 |
| Referencias citadas | 25 |
BACKGROUND: The association between volume of patients treated and quality of care has important implications for patient referral policies and approaches to quality improvement. Most studies have focused on hospital volume alone and health outcomes. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this work was to examine the association of hospital and physician volume with use of aspirin and reperfusion therapy in the management of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in eligible patients. METHODS: We reviewed charts of 2,215 patients treated at 35 Minnesota hospitals for AMI between October 1, 1992, and July 31, 1993, comparing use of aspirin and reperfusion therapy in eligible patients across different physician and hospital volume categories through multiple logistic regression. RESULTS: Aspirin use did not vary significantly with physician volume. Use of reperfusion therapy was reduced among the lowest-volume physicians only (adjusted OR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.15-0.94). Compared with the highest volume hospitals (treating >200 patients), aspirin use among lower-volume hospitals was lower. This was statistically significant only in the hospitals treating <30 patients (adjusted OR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.30-0.97). These same hospitals had increased odds of using thrombolytics (adjusted OR, 3.02; 95% CI, 1.40-6.53). CONCLUSIONS: Differences in use of aspirin and reperfusion therapy occur at the extremes of hospital and physician volume. These observed differences are in the anticipated direction, except for the increased use of thrombolytics at very-low-volume hospitals. This may be a "desperation reaction" with a perceived lack of other alternatives, such as cardiac catheterization labs and cardiologists
Aspirin · Family medicine · Intensive care medicine · Logistic regression · Myocardial infarction · Odds ratio · Referral · Reperfusion therapy · Acute Myocardial Infarction Research · Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases · Emergency Medicine · Heart Failure Treatment and Management · Internal Medicine · Medicine
Systematic Review
Hospital-Level Performance Improvement
Determinants of Receipt of Ambulatory Medical Care in a National Sample of Mentally Ill Homeless Veterans
The Relationships Among Physician and Hospital Volume, Processes, and Outcomes of Care for Acute Myocardial Infarction
A Remarkable Legacy of Science
Regression Analysis for Correlated Data
Physician and Hospital Factors Associated With Mortality of Surgical Patients
Does Practice Make Perfect
Effects of Surgeon Volume and Hospital Volume on Quality of Care in Hospitals
Centralization, Certification, and Monitoring
Hospital Medical Staff Organization and Quality of Care
The Effects of Patient, Hospital, and Physician Characteristics on Length of Stay and Mortality
Selecting Categories of Patients for Regionalization
The Importance of Co-existent Disease in the Occurrence of Postoperative Complications and One-Year Recovery in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Replacement
Volume-Outcome Relationships and Inhospital Mortality
| Obras citantes distintas | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,21 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2002 - 2014 (13) |
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 5 |