Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Interpreting and Acting on the PRO Scores From the Patient-reported Outcomes for Personalized Treatment and Care (PROMPT-Care) eHealth System

Dados Bibliográficos

ID9103468
AutoresAfaf Girgis (0000-0003-4101-4006, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, NSW, autor correspondente), Ivana Durcinoska (0000-0002-9568-0058, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, NSW, autor correspondente), Anthony Arnold (0000-0003-4866-8125, Illawarra Cancer Care Centre, Wollongong Hospital, Wollongong), Geoff P Delaney (0000-0002-1829-396X, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, NSW, autor correspondente)
Ano2019
Volume57
FascículoSuppl 1
PáginasS85-S91
Data de publicação2019-05-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessNão
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoMedical Care (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948
EditoraOvid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1097/mlr.0000000000001094
PMID30985601
OpenAlexW2937275896
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas3
Referências citadas24

INTRODUCTION: Patient-reported Outcomes for Personalized Treatment and Care (PROMPT-Care) is the first eHealth system in Australia that is fully electronically integrated into hospital oncology information systems, enabling real-time, routine collection of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) to support and enable cancer patients to achieve and maintain improved health, well-being, and cancer outcomes. Five previously published papers detail the impetus for developing this eHealth system, its development, and testing of its acceptability and feasibility, the development of algorithms to standardize the cancer care pathways which underpin patient care, and the protocol for evaluating the efficacy of PROMPT-Care. METHODS: This manuscript provides "how-to" guidance to inform future system development, focusing on selecting relevant PROs and measuring them in cancer patients, score interpretation, and determining recommended care in response to scores which are above the predetermined threshold. DISCUSSION: Electronic PRO systems are increasingly used in cancer clinical care settings, with the potential to support timely patient-centered care when implemented appropriately. KEY POINTS: PRO selection should consider patient response burden, and prioritizing PROs that are amenable to clinical intervention. Having clear, evidence-based, care pathways, and actionable recommendations in response to above-threshold PRO scores facilitate PRO integration into the clinical workflow. Centers should determine thresholds for clinical action for each PRO which provide an acceptable balance between false positives and false negatives; and develop care pathway recommendations which consider the availability of local services and resources, are feasible in the clinical setting, clear, concise, manageable, based on evidence-based guidelines, and adaptable to local environments

Alternative medicine · eHealth · Health care · Intervention (counseling) · Medical emergency · MEDLINE · Protocol (science) · Workflow · Cancer survivorship and care · Computer Science · Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer · Global Cancer Incidence and Screening · Medicine · Nursing

  • Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measurements in chronic and malignant diseases

    Open Access•Niels Henrik Hjøllund, Louise Pape Larsen et al.•Quality of Life Research•2023

  • A PRO-cision Medicine Methods Toolkit to Address the Challenges of Personalizing Cancer Care Using Patient-Reported Outcomes

    Claire Snyder, Michael Brundage et al.•Medical Care•2019

  • Can Methods Developed for Interpreting Group-level Patient-reported Outcome Data be Applied to Individual Patient Management

    Madeleine King, Madeleine T King et al.•Medical Care•2019

  • The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy scale

    David Cella, D F Cella et al.•Journal of Clinical Oncology•1993

  • Using Rasch analysis to examine the distress thermometer’s cut-off scores among a mixed group of patients with cancer

    Open Access•Sylvie D Lambert, Julie Pallant et al.•Quality of Life Research•2014

Obras citantes distintas3
Citações por ano0,43
Intervalo de citações2019 - 2023 (5)
Velocidade de citaçãohistorical
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 3
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae