Defining Quality of Life Levels to Enhance Clinical Interpretation in Multiple Sclerosis
Application of a Novel Clustering Method
Bibliographic Data
BACKGROUND: To enhance the use of quality of life (QoL) measures in clinical practice, it is pertinent to help clinicians interpret QoL scores. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to define clusters of QoL levels from a specific questionnaire (MusiQoL) for multiple sclerosis (MS) patients using a new method of interpretable clustering based on unsupervised binary trees and to test the validity regarding clinical and functional outcomes. METHODS: In this international, multicenter, cross-sectional study, patients with MS were classified using a hierarchical top-down method of Clustering using Unsupervised Binary Trees. The clustering tree was built using the 9 dimension scores of the MusiQoL in 2 stages, growing and tree reduction (pruning and joining). A 3-group structure was considered, as follows: "high," "moderate," and "low" QoL levels. Clinical and QoL data were compared between the 3 clusters. RESULTS: A total of 1361 patients were analyzed: 87 were classified with "low," 1173 with "moderate," and 101 with "high" QoL levels. The clustering showed satisfactory properties, including repeatability (using bootstrap) and discriminancy (using factor analysis). The 3 clusters consistently differentiated patients based on sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, and the QoL scores were assessed using a generic questionnaire, ensuring the clinical validity of the clustering. CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests that Clustering using Unsupervised Binary Trees is an original, innovative, and relevant classification method to define clusters of QoL levels in MS patients
Cluster analysis · Hierarchical clustering · Pruning · Quality of life (healthcare) · Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research · Artificial Intelligence · Cancer survivorship and care · Computer Science · Medicine · Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
Comparing partitions
Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis
Using quality of life measures in the clinical setting
Objective Criteria for the Evaluation of Clustering Methods
Empirically driven definitions of “good,” “moderate,” and “poor” levels of functioning in the treatment of schizophrenia
Barriers to the Use of Health Status Measures in Clinical Investigation, Patient Care, and Policy Research
The use of patient reported outcome measures in routine clinical practice
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,18 |
| Citation span | 2015 - 2017 (3) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |