Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Development and Validation of Measures to Assess Prevention and Control of AMR in Hospitals

Dados Bibliográficos

ID9103683
AutoresMindy Flanagan (0000-0002-7146-5628, University of Iowa, autor correspondente), Rangaraj Ramanujam (0000-0002-5420-0329, University of Iowa, autor correspondente), Jason M Sutherland (0000-0002-1857-2432, University of Iowa, autor correspondente), Jason Sutherland, Thomas Vaughn (0000-0003-1747-2293, University of Iowa, autor correspondente), Daniel Diekema, Daniel J Diekema (0000-0003-1273-0724, University of Iowa), Bradley N Doebbeling (0000-0003-3504-3468, University of Iowa, autor correspondente)
Ano2007
Volume45
Fascículo6
Páginas537-544
Data de publicação2007-06-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessNão
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoMedical Care (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948
EditoraOvid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1097/mlr.0b013e31803bb48b
PMID17515781
OpenAlexW2073555298
IdiomaEN
Referências citadas29

BACKGROUND: The rapid spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in the US hospitals poses serious quality and safety problems. Expert panels, identifying strategies for optimizing antibiotic use and preventing AMR spread, have recommended hospitals undertake efforts to implement specific evidence-based practices. OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a measurement scale for assessing hospitals' efforts to implement recommended AMR prevention and control measures. STUDY DESIGN: Surveys were mailed to infection control professionals in a national sample of 670 US hospitals stratified by geographic region, bedsize, teaching status, and VA affiliation. SUBJECTS: : Four hundred forty-eight infection control professionals participated (67% response rate). METHODS: Survey items measured implementation of guideline recommendations, practices for AMR monitoring and feedback, AMR-related outcomes (methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus prevalence and outbreaks [MRSA]), and organizational features. "Derivation" and "validation" samples were randomly selected. Exploratory factor analysis was performed to identify factors underlying AMR prevention and control efforts. Multiple methods were used for validation. RESULTS: We identified 4 empirically distinct factors in AMR prevention and control: (1) practices for antimicrobial prescription/use, (2) information/resources for AMR control, (3) practices for isolating infected patients, and (4) organizational support for infection control policies. The Prevention and Control of Antimicrobial Resistance scale was reliable and had content and construct validity. MRSA prevalence was significantly lower in hospitals with higher resource/information availability and broader organizational support. CONCLUSIONS: The Prevention and Control of Antimicrobial Resistance scale offers a simple yet discriminating assessment of AMR prevention and control efforts. Use should complement assessment methods based exclusively on AMR outcomes

Control (management) · MEDLINE · Political science · Antibiotic Use and Resistance · Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus · Artificial Intelligence · Computer Science · Infection Control in Healthcare · Medicine

  • Statistical Analysis With Missing Data

    Maureen Lahiff, Roderick J A Little et al.•Journal of the American…•1989

  • Surveying Physicians

    Terry S Field, Cynthia A Cadoret et al.•Medical Care•2002

  • Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures

    Peter M Bentler, Douglas G Bonett•Psychological Bulletin•1980

Velocidade de citaçãohistorical
Altamente citadoNão
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae