A Comparison of the Case???Control and Case???Crossover Designs for Estimating Medical Costs of Nonfatal Fall-Related Injuries Among Older Americans
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9103778 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Eric A Finkelstein (0000-0001-6443-9686, RTI International, corresponding author), Hong Chen (0000-0002-9771-6464, RTI International, corresponding author), Ted R Miller (0000-0002-0958-2639, Pacific Institute For Research and Evaluation), Phaedra S Corso (0000-0001-6723-2998, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), Judy A Stevens (National Center for Injury Prevention and Control) |
| Year | 2005 |
| Volume | 43 |
| Issue | 11 |
| Pages | 1087-1091 |
| Publication date | 2005-11-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Medical Care (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948 |
| Publisher | Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1097/01.mlr.0000182513.35595.60 |
| PMID | 16224301 |
| OpenAlex | W2069411372 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 8 |
OBJECTIVES: Although the case-crossover design has been used widely in epidemiological and cost-offset studies as an alternative to the case-control design, it is rarely applied to cost-of-illness studies. In this study, costs for a series of hospitalized and nonhospitalized fall-related injuries were computed using the 2 approaches to allow for a direct comparison of the results. RESEARCH DESIGN: We used claims data from the Medicare fee-for-service 5% Standard Analytical Files. For the case-control design, those who sustained nonfatal fall-related injuries were tracked for 1 year after their first fall, and costs were compared, using regression analysis, to annual costs for a comparison sample of nonfallers. The case-crossover design used a modified regression approach that compared monthly costs of fallers before and after fall. RESULTS: We present unit costs for falls requiring (1) a hospitalization resulting in a live discharge, (2) an emergency department visit not resulting in an admission, and (3) falls requiring office-based or hospital outpatient visits only. Using the case-control design, these costs were $22,260, $3890, and $5040 respectively. Using the case-crossover design, these estimates were reduced to $20,920, $3230, and $4200. CONCLUSIONS: On average, estimates of the costs of fall injuries from the case-control design were between 6% and 17% greater than those from the case-crossover approach. These differences likely result from our inability to control for comorbidity differences between fallers and nonfallers in the case-control design. Under several scenarios, including unobserved heterogeneity between cases and controls, the case-crossover design, although computationally more intensive, produces more accurate results
Clinical study design · Clinical trial · Crossover study · Emergency department · Poison control · Psychiatry · Research design · Statistics · Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention · Emergency Medicine · Frailty in Older Adults · Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life · Mathematics · Medicine
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,2 |
| Citation span | 2016 - 2018 (3) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |