Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Nontraditional Surrogate Decision Makers for Hospitalized Older Adults

Dados Bibliográficos

ID9103849
AutoresAmber R Comer (0000-0001-6242-8940, Indiana University School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, autor correspondente), James E Slaven (0000-0002-6744-3821, Department of Biostatistics, Indiana University (IU)), Annie Montz (Indiana University Center for Aging Research), Emily Burke (0000-0002-5813-7785, Indiana University Center for Aging Research), Lev Inger (Indiana University Center for Aging Research), Alexia M Torke (0000-0001-9609-714X, Regenstrief Institute), Alexia Torke (Regenstrief Institute Inc.)
Ano2018
Volume56
Fascículo4
Páginas337-340
Data de publicação2018-04-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessNão
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoMedical Care (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948
EditoraOvid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1097/mlr.0000000000000890
PMID29485530
OpenAlexW2791800035
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas1
Referências citadas14

BACKGROUND: Without advanced preparation of legal documents, state law determines who may serve as a surrogate decision maker for patients in hospitals. OBJECTIVES: To examine the relationship characteristics associated with traditional versus nontraditional health care surrogates who are making medical decisions for patients in hospitals. RESEARCH DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a baseline cross-sectional survey of a larger prospective observational study. SUBJECTS: In total, 364 patient/surrogate dyads consisting of patients aged 65 years and older admitted to the medical or medical intensive care unit services who lacked decision-making capacity based on a physician assessment and also had a surrogate available. RESULTS: This study of surrogate decision makers for hospitalized older adults found that the relationships of nontraditional surrogates such as, nieces, nephews, and friends serving in the surrogate role is nearly identical to those of traditional, first degree relatives serving as a surrogate. Over two-thirds (71.2%) of nontraditional surrogates saw the patient in-person at least weekly compared with 80.8% of legal surrogates (P-value, 0.9023). Almost all traditional and nontraditional surrogates discussed the patient's medical preferences with the patient (96.9% of legal surrogates and 89.2% of nontraditional surrogates; P=0.0510). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that both traditional and nontraditional surrogates, who are a patient's primary care giver have similar relationships with patients. The findings of this study suggest that requiring family members such as grandchildren to take the extra step of formal appointment through a legal channel may not be necessary to protect patients. Therefore, broader state laws expanding the list of surrogates authorized by state statute to include more nontraditional surrogates may be necessary

Family medicine · Observational study · Surrogate endpoint · Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare · Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints · Medicine · Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues · Psychology

  • Are the “Right” People Selected for First Disclosures About Suicidal Thoughts? Exploring What We Know About Advance Care Planning in the Context of Safety Planning

    Open Access•Anthony Fulginiti, Laura M Frey•Community Mental Health Journal•2019

Obras citantes distintas1
Citações por ano0,14
Intervalo de citações2019 - 2019 (1)
Velocidade de citaçãohistorical
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 1
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae