Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Two Innovative Cancer Care Programs Have Potential to Reduce Utilization and Spending

Bibliographic Data

ID9103859
AuthorsErin Murphy Colligan (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, corresponding author), Erin Ewald (NORC at the University of Chicago, Bethesda, MD), Nancy L Keating (0000-0002-8274-4681, Harvard Medical School), Shriram Parashuram (NORC at the University of Chicago, Bethesda, MD), Michelle Spafford (0000-0002-7302-8894, NORC at the University of Chicago, Bethesda, MD), Sarah Ruiz (0000-0003-2781-105X, Administration for Community Living, Washington, DC), Adil Moiduddin (NORC at the University of Chicago, Bethesda, MD)
Year2017
Volume55
Issue10
Pages873-878
Publication date2017-10-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueMedical Care (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948
PublisherOvid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1097/mlr.0000000000000795
PMID28906313
OpenAlexW2755097667
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited19

BACKGROUND: Cancer patients often present to the emergency department (ED) and hospital for symptom management, but many of these visits are avoidable and costly. OBJECTIVE: We assessed the impact of 2 Health Care Innovation Awards that used an oncology medical home model [Community Oncology Medical Home (COME HOME)] or patient navigation model [Patient Care Connect Program (PCCP)] on utilization and spending. METHODS: Participants in COME HOME and PCCP models were matched to similar comparators using propensity scores. We analyzed utilization and spending outcomes using Medicare fee-for-service claims with unadjusted and adjusted difference-in-differences models. RESULTS: In the adjusted models, both COME HOME and PCCP were associated with fewer ED visits than a comparison group (15 and 22 per 1000 patients/quarter, respectively; P<0.01). In addition, COME HOME had lower spending ($675 per patient/quarter; P<0.01), and PCCP had fewer hospitalizations (11 per 1000 patients/quarter; P<0.05), relative to the comparison group. Among patients undergoing chemotherapy, fewer COME HOME and PCCP patients had ED visits (18 and 28 per 1000 patients/quarter, respectively; P<0.01) and fewer PCCP patients had hospitalizations (13 per 1000 patients/quarter; P<0.05), than comparison patients. CONCLUSIONS: The oncology medical home and patient navigator programs both showed reductions in spending or utilization. Adoption of such programs holds promise for improving cancer care

Emergency department · Family medicine · Health care · Medical emergency · Medical home · Patient satisfaction · Primary care · Propensity score matching · Quarter (Canadian coin) · Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer · Emergency Medicine · Internal Medicine · Medicine · Neutropenia and Cancer Infections · Nursing · Primary Care and Health Outcomes

  • Redesigning Oncology Care Delivery

    Arif H Kamal•Medical Care•2017

Citations per year0.11
Citation span2017 - 2017 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae