Conducting Physician Mail Surveys on a Limited Budget
A Randomized Trial Comparing $2 Bill Versus $5 Bill Incentives
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9103969 |
|---|---|
| Authors | David A Asch (0000-0002-7970-286X, Department of Veterans Affairs, corresponding author), Nicholas A Christakis (0000-0001-5547-1086), Peter A Ubel (0000-0001-8218-519X) |
| Year | 1998 |
| Volume | 36 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 95-99 |
| Publication date | 1998-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Medical Care (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948 |
| Publisher | Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1097/00005650-199801000-00011 |
| PMID | 9431335 |
| OpenAlex | W2013285007 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 10 |
| References cited | 11 |
OBJECTIVES: The effects of incentive size on physicians' response rates to a mail survey were determined. METHODS: One thousand US primary care physicians were assigned randomly to receive a survey with either a $5 bill or a $2 bill as an incentive. For each of the two incentive groups, the overall response rate for three mailing waves, the total cost, and the total cost per usable response were measured. RESULTS: The response rate among those receiving the $5 bill (61%) was 32% higher than the response rate among those receiving the $2 bill (46%); overall costs were slightly higher in the $5 group, but the cost per response for each group was similar ($15.46 versus $14.93). For the same cost, a higher response rate could have been achieved in the $2 group if costs saved from foregoing the third mailing were instead used to increase the incentive for a portion of the subjects. CONCLUSIONS: A $5 bill incentive yielded a higher response rate among the physicians in this study than did a $2 bill incentive. Moreover, the powerful effect of the incentive size, combined with the consequent decline in the costs of subsequent mailing waves, suggests that resources in a fixed survey budget are allocated more efficiently to increasing the initial incentive rather than to providing a third wave to nonresponders
Actuarial science · Business · Economics · Family medicine · Incentive · Incentive program · Microeconomics · Postal service · Census and Population Estimation · Medicine · Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare · Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires
Randomized experiment on the effect of incentives and mailing strategy on response rates in a mail survey of dentists
Effects of Small Monetary Incentives on Return Rates of a Health Survey to Adults in Rural Areas
Difficult, Dysfunctional, and Drug-Dependent
Evaluating the effect of esthetically enhanced materials compared to standard materials on clinician response rates to a mailed survey
Surveying Physicians
Effects of Different Monetary Incentives on the Return Rate of a National Mail Survey of Physicians
Prepaid Monetary Incentives-Predictors of Taking the Money and Completing the Survey
Who serves the underserved? Predictors of physician care to medically indigent patients
The influence of cost-effectiveness information on physicians' cancer screening recommendations
| Unique citing works | 10 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,4 |
| Citation span | 2001 - 2022 (22) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 10 |