Measuring Population Health
A Comparison Of Three Generic Health Status Measures
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 9104090 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Susan Macran (Health Economics and Outcomes Research (United Kingdom), autor de correspondencia), Helen Weatherly (0000-0002-9117-6452), Paul Kind (0000-0003-2377-1652, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2003 |
| Volumen | 41 |
| Número | 2 |
| Páginas | 218-231 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2003-02-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Medical Care (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948 |
| Editorial | Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1097/01.mlr.0000044901.57067.19 |
| PMID | 12555050 |
| OpenAlex | W1992999318 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 28 |
| Referencias citadas | 13 |
OBJECTIVES: The relative performance of three widely used generic health status measures (EQ-5D, a modified HUI3 [mHUI3], and SF-12) was compared within a general population sample. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were taken from a cohort of persons identified from the patient list of a large general practice in York, UK. Two-way comparisons were made between EQ-5D and mHUI3 and EQ-5D and SF-12. The measures were assessed in terms of their practical viability, coverage, and discrimination. Practical viability was evaluated in terms of the extent of missing responses and the proportion indicating difficulty with a measure. Coverage examined the range of responses across the items in the measures. Discrimination examined the capacity of the measures to discriminate between persons according to their self-reported morbidity and socioeconomic status. RESULTS: One thousand one hundred twenty-six persons completed a postal questionnaire containing EQ-5D and either mHUI3 (n = 593) or SF-12 (n = 533). Missing responses were low across all three instruments. SF-12 showed a broad distribution of responses across its items however, responses on the mHUI3 hearing, speech and dexterity dimensions and the EQ-5D self-care dimension were highly skewed, with few persons reporting problems. In terms of summary scores, mHUI3 identified more mild health states than EQ-5D. EQ-5D and mHUI3 showed slightly better discrimination than SF-12. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the inherent differences in their descriptive systems and scoring functions, no one instrument performed better or worse than the other with respect to the criteria applied in this study. Some of the issues to be considered when choosing a population health measure are discussed
Cohort · Descriptive statistics · Disease · Environmental health · EQ-5D · Health related quality of life · Missing data · Population · Sample (material) · Socioeconomic status · Statistics · Chronic Disease Management Strategies · Demography · Health disparities and outcomes · Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life · Mathematics · Medicine · Psychology
The Impact of 29 Chronic Conditions on Health-related Quality of Life
Predicting EQ-5D utility scores from the 25-item National Eye Institute Vision Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ 25) in patients with age-related macular degeneration
The predictive validity of health-related quality of life measures
Comparison of EQ-5D, HUI, and SF-36-derived societal health state values among Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) participants
The EQ-5D-5L index score is more discriminative than the EQ-5D-3L index score in diabetes patients
Validation of the EQ-5D quality of life instrument in patients after myocardial infarction
EQ-5D-3L as a health measure of Brazilian adult population
Evaluating the discriminatory power of EQ-5D, HUI2 and HUI3 in a US general population survey using Shannon’s indices
Quantification of the level descriptors for the standard EQ-5D three-level system and a five-level version according to two methods
Feasibility, reliability, and validity of the EQ-5D-Y
Measurement properties of the EQ-5D-5L compared to the EQ-5D-3L across eight patient groups
Discriminative capacity of the EQ-5D, SF-6D, and SF-12 as measures of health status in population health survey
Comparison of three societally derived health-state classification values among older African Americans with depressive symptoms
The health status of the Dutch population as assessed by the EQ-6D
Sociodemographic and neighbourhood determinants of health-related quality of life among grade-five students in Canada
Estimating EQ-5D utility values for major health behavioural risk factors in England
Self-Reported Health Status of the General Adult U.S. Population as Assessed by the EQ-5D and Health Utilities Index
Prevalent falls, fall frequencies and health-related quality of life among community-dwelling older Chinese adults
Patients’ Self-Reported Disability Weights of Top-Ranking Diseases in Thailand
The trend in quality of life of Chinese population
Comparison of three health-related quality of life instruments in relation to visual acuity
Do Drug Accessibility and OOP Burden Affect Health-Related Quality of Life of Patients With Chronic Diseases? — EQ-5D-5L Evaluation Evidence From Five Districts in China
The worse the better? Quantile treatment effects of a conditional cash transfer programme on mental health
The Demography of Mental Health Among Mature Adults in a Low-Income, High-HIV-Prevalence Context
Relative Efficiency of the EQ-5D, HUI2, and HUI3 Index Scores in Measuring Health Burden of Chronic Medical Conditions in a Population Health Survey in the United States
A National Catalog of Preference-Based Scores for Chronic Conditions in the United States
Private Intergenerational Transfers, Family Structure, and Health in a sub-Saharan African Context
Self-reported health and socio-economic inequalities in England, 1996-2009
Cross-Validation of Item Selection and Scoring for the SF-12 Health Survey in Nine Countries
A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey
The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)
Comparison of the EQ-5D and SF-12 in an adult US sample
Reliability of the Health Utilities Index—Mark III used in the 1991 cycle 6 Canadian General Social Survey Health Questionnaire
Testing the validity of the Euroqol and comparing it with the SF-36 health survey questionnaire
Multiattribute Utility Function for a Comprehensive Health Status Classification System
Comparison of the EQ-5D and SF-12 Health Surveys in a General Population Survey in Alberta, Canada
Health Utilities Index Mark 3
Test-retest reliability of health state valuations collected with the EuroQol questionnaire
| Obras citantes distintas | 28 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 1,33 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2005 - 2023 (19) |
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 11 |