The Role of Health Information Technology in Care Coordination in the United States
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9104273 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Chun-Ju Hsiao, Chun‐Ju Hsiao (0000-0001-5494-1971, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, corresponding author), Jennifer King (0000-0001-9572-8210, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology), Esther Hing (0000-0001-8051-9678, National Center for Health Statistics), Alan E Simon (National Center for Health Statistics) |
| Year | 2015 |
| Volume | 53 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 184-190 |
| Publication date | 2015-02-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Medical Care (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948 |
| Publisher | Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1097/mlr.0000000000000276 |
| PMID | 25464164 |
| OpenAlex | W2043560285 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 12 |
OBJECTIVES: Examine the extent to which office-based physicians in the United States receive patient health information necessary to coordinate care across settings and determine whether receipt of information needed to coordinate care is associated with use of health information technology (HIT) (defined by presence or absence of electronic health record system and electronic sharing of information). RESEARCH DESIGN: Cross-sectional study using the 2012 National Electronic Health Records Survey (65% weighted response rate). SUBJECTS: Office-based physicians. MEASURES: Use of HIT and 3 types of patient health information needed to coordinate care. RESULTS: In 2012, 64% of physicians routinely received the results of a patient's consultation with a provider outside of their practice, whereas 46% routinely received a patient's history and reason for a referred consultation from a provider outside of their practice. About 54% of physicians reported routinely receiving a patient's hospital discharge information. In adjusted analysis, significant differences in receiving necessary information were observed by use of HIT. Compared with those not using HIT, a lower percentage of physicians who used an electronic health record system and shared patient health information electronically failed to receive the results of outside consultations or patient's history and reason for a referred consultation. No significant differences were observed for the receipt of hospital discharge information by use of HIT. Among physicians routinely receiving information needed for care coordination, at least 54% of them did not receive the information electronically. CONCLUSIONS: Although a higher percentage of physicians using HIT received patient information necessary for care coordination than those who did not use HIT, more than one third did not routinely receive the needed patient information at all
Business · Electronic health record · Family medicine · Health care · Health information · Health information exchange · Health Information National Trends Survey · Health information technology · Medical emergency · MEDLINE · Patient portal · Receipt · Electronic Health Records Systems · Healthcare Systems and Technology · Medicine · Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Understanding How to Improve the Use of Clinical Coordination Mechanisms between Primary and Secondary Care Doctors
Coordinating women's preventive health care for rural veterans
Coordinating Care Across Health Care Systems for Veterans With Gynecologic Malignancies
The Impact of a National Health Information Exchange Program Under a Single-payer System
| Citations per year | 0.44 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2017 - 2022 (6) |
| Highly cited | No |