Profiling Individual Physicians Using Administrative Data From a Single Insurer
Variance Components, Reliability, and Implications for Performance Improvement Efforts
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 9104552 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Frank Eijkenaar (0000-0002-4471-7623, Erasmus University Rotterdam), René C J A Van Vliet (Erasmus University Rotterdam) |
| Año | 2013 |
| Volumen | 51 |
| Número | 8 |
| Páginas | 731-739 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2013-08-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Medical Care (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948 |
| Editorial | Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1097/mlr.0b013e3182992bc1 |
| PMID | 23698181 |
| OpenAlex | W1989897767 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referencias citadas | 16 |
BACKGROUND: Individual physicians are increasingly being subjected to comparative performance assessments. When single-insurer data are used to profile individual physicians' performance, reliable measurements are uncertain because of small sample sizes. METHODS: Administrative data (2006-2008) from a Dutch insurer are used to examine variation in general practitioners' (GPs) performance on expenses (5 measures), utilization of hospital care (2 measures), and clinical quality for diabetes and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (6 measures). Unadjusted and adjusted multilevel models are used to separate total variance in between-GP and within-GP components. The components are used to calculate intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), reliability, and sample size requirements at common reliability thresholds. RESULTS: Average ICCs varied between 0.07% (hospital admissions) and 8.34% (physiotherapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients). Risk-adjustment often greatly changed the relative size of variance components and often led to lower ICCs. In addition, ICCs and thus reliability generally decreased over time. Eight measures had reliabilities > 0.70, and 3 of these (all GP-related expenses) > 0.90. Measures related to utilization of hospital care had reliabilities < 0.60 or even 0.50. For 5 measures, the vast majority of GPs had sufficient patients to reach 0.70 reliability. At a reliability of 0.90, however, there were no measures for which all GPs met the sample size requirements. CONCLUSIONS: Reliable measurement of individual physicians' performance using single-purchaser data is challenging. For most measures reliability was insufficient to allow for high-stakes applications or even any application of profiling. Future research should continue to explore methods for enhancing the reliability of individual physicians' profiles
Intraclass correlation · Psychometrics · Reliability (semiconductor) · Sample (material) · Sample size determination · Statistics · Variance (accounting) · Healthcare Policy and Management · Mathematics · Medicine · Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare · Primary Care and Health Outcomes
Prior Use of Durable Medical Equipment as a Risk Adjuster for Health-Based Capitation
Health-Based Risk Adjustment
Reliability of Medical Group and Physician Performance Measurement in the Primary Care Setting
Reducing Random Variation in Reported Rates of Pressure Ulcer Development
Are There Detectable Differences in Quality of Care or Outcome of Depression Across Primary Care Providers
Improving the Reliability of Physician Performance Assessment
Meaningful Variation in Performance
How can Health Care Organizations be Reliably Compared
Meaningful Variation in Performance
Risk-adjusted Payment and Performance Assessment for Primary Care
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | No |