Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Assessment of the Validity and Reliability of Three Systems of Medical Record Screening for Quality of Care Assessment

Bibliographic Data

ID9104851
AuthorsLuiz Antônio Bastos Camacho (0000-0003-4656-1914, Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública, corresponding author), Haya R Rubin
Year1998
Volume36
Issue5
Pages748-751
Publication date1998-05-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueMedical Care (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948
PublisherOvid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1097/00005650-199805000-00014
PMID9596065
OpenAlexW2321570764
LanguageEN
References cited3

OBJECTIVES: The authors compared the validity and reliability of three methods of medical record screening for detecting problems with quality of care of patients undergoing cardiovascular procedures: (1) the Uniform Clinical Data Set System (UCDSS), a software-based system developed by the Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA), (2) the HCFA generic screens, and (3) the Harvard Medical Practice Study (HMPS) screening criteria. METHODS: A random sample of 451 medical records of inpatients who underwent cardiovascular procedures were screened by trained nurses and were also examined by physicians masked to screening results. Physicians' judgment provided a reference standard for validity assessment of screening applied by nurses. RESULTS: Agreement between pairs of physician reviews about the quality of care was fair or slight (Kappa < 0.40). Agreement between nurses about presence of any screening flags was excellent for UCDSS (0.93), slight for HCFA (0.11), and fair for HMPS (0.41). The UCDSS was more sensitive to quality problems agreed on by two physicians than HCFA or HMPS (85%, 74%, and 69%, respectively), but was also less specific (48%, 57%, and 56%, respectively). The UCDSS was much more labor-intensive with an average of 6.7 hours of nurse review per quality problem disclosed versus 2 hours required by HCFA and HMPS. CONCLUSIONS: The UCDSS computerized screens brought about substantial improvements in reliability of medical record screening, but needed to reduce its false-positive rate and to increase efficiency before it is used. From the perspective of continuous quality improvement, the UCDSS computerized algorithms provided a starting point to developing disease-specific patterns of practice to guide interventions

Health care · Health care financing · Kappa · Medical emergency · Medical record · Minimum Data Set · Nursing homes · Quality (philosophy) · Reliability (semiconductor) · Medicine · Nursing · Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation · Patient Safety and Medication Errors · Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare · Surgery

  • Reliability and Validity of Judgments Concerning Adverse Events Suffered by Hospitalized Patients

    Troyen A Brennan, Russsell J Localio et al.•Medical Care•1989

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae