Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Cost of Implementing and Sustaining the COMprehensive Post-Acute Stroke Services Model

Bibliographic Data

ID9104862
AuthorsWilliam S Bayliss (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, corresponding author), Cheryl D Bushnell (Department of Neurology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem), Cheryl Bushnell (0000-0002-3162-7610, Wake Forest University), Jacqueline R Halladay (0000-0002-1300-353X, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill), Pamela W Duncan (0000-0002-4838-3253, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill), Janet K Freburger (0000-0001-8467-9468, University of Pittsburgh), Anna M Kucharska-Newton (0000-0001-9864-467X, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill), Justin G Trogdon (0000-0001-5484-7870, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, corresponding author)
Year2021
Volume59
Issue2
Pages163-168
Publication date2021-02-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueMedical Care (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948
PublisherOvid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1097/mlr.0000000000001462
PMID33273292
OpenAlexW3110099879
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited15

BACKGROUND: The COMprehensive Post-Acute Stroke Services (COMPASS) model, a transitional care intervention for stroke patients discharged home, was tested against status quo postacute stroke care in a cluster-randomized trial in 40 hospitals in North Carolina. This study examined the hospital-level costs associated with implementing and sustaining COMPASS. METHODS: Using an activity-based costing survey, we estimated hospital-level resource costs spent on COMPASS-related activities during approximately 1 year. We identified hospitals that were actively engaged in COMPASS during the year before the survey and collected resource cost estimates from 22 hospitals. We used median wage data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and COMPASS enrollment data to estimate the hospital-level costs per COMPASS enrollee. RESULTS: Between November 2017 and March 2019, 1582 patients received the COMPASS intervention across the 22 hospitals included in this analysis. Average annual hospital-level COMPASS costs were $2861 per patient (25th percentile: $735; 75th percentile: $3,475). Having 10% higher stroke patient volume was associated with 5.1% lower COMPASS costs per patient (P=0.016). About half (N=10) of hospitals reported postacute clinic visits as their highest-cost activity, while a third (N=7) reported case ascertainment (ie, identifying eligible patients) as their highest-cost activity. CONCLUSIONS: We found that the costs of implementing COMPASS varied across hospitals. On average, hospitals with higher stroke volume and higher enrollment reported lower costs per patient. Based on average costs of COMPASS and readmissions for stroke patients, COMPASS could lower net costs if the model is able to prevent about 6 readmissions per year

Cartography · Compass · Cost–benefit analysis · Geography · Medical emergency · Percentile · Physical therapy · Statistics · Stroke (engine) · Acute Ischemic Stroke Management · Demography · Emergency Medicine · Medicine · Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues · Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery

  • The economic burden of individuals living with generalized myasthenia gravis and facing social determinants of health challenges

    Open Access•Tom Hughes, James F Howard et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2023

Citations per year0.33
Citation span2023 - 2023 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae