Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Bias in Telephone Surveys That do not Sample Cell Phones

Uses and Limits of Poststratification Adjustments

Bibliographic Data

ID9104958
AuthorsKathleen Thiede Call (0000-0003-2731-1573, University of Minnesota, corresponding author), Michael Davern (0000-0002-9572-812X, University of Chicago), Michel Boudreaux (0000-0002-3657-5178, University of Minnesota, corresponding author), Pamela Jo Johnson (0000-0003-3034-1378, Allina Health), Justine Nelson (Minnesota Department of Human Services)
Year2011
Volume49
Issue4
Pages355-364
Publication date2011-04-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueMedical Care (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948
PublisherOvid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1097/mlr.0b013e3182028ac7
PMID21407032
OpenAlexW34957250
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited1

OBJECTIVE: To examine how biased health surveys are when they omit cell phone-only households (CPOH) and to explore whether poststratification can reduce this bias. METHODS: We used data from the 2008 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), which uses area probability sampling and in-person interviews; as a result people of all phone statuses are included. First, we examined whether people living in CPOH are different from those not living in CPOH with respect to several important health surveillance domains. We compared standard NHIS estimates to a set of "reweighted" estimates that exclude people living in CPHO. The reweighted NHIS cases were fitted through a series of poststratification adjustments to NHIS control totals. In addition to poststratification adjustments for region, race or ethnicity, and age, we examined adjustments for home ownership, age by education, and household structure. RESULTS: Poststratification reduces bias in all health-related estimates for the nonelderly population. However, these adjustments work less well for Hispanics and blacks and even worse for young adults (18 to 30 y). Reduction in bias is greatest for estimates of uninsurance and having no usual source of care, and worse for estimates of drinking, smoking, and forgone or delayed care because of costs. CONCLUSIONS: Applying poststratification adjustments to data that exclude CPOH works well at the total population level for estimates such as health insurance, and less well for access and health behaviors. However, poststratification adjustments do not do enough to reduce bias in health-related estimates at the subpopulation level, particularly for those interested in measuring and monitoring racial, ethnic, and age disparities

Sample (material) · Data-Driven Disease Surveillance · Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging · Medicine · Survey Methodology and Nonresponse

  • Monitoring Health Reform Efforts

    Open Access•Kathleen Thiede Call, Lynn A Blewett et al.•INQUIRY The Journal of Health…•2013

  • Assessing the psychometric properties of the Guarding Minds @ Work questionnaire recommended in the Canadian Standard for Psychological Health and Safety in the Workplace

    Open Access•Peter M Smith, Oľga Križanová et al.•Quality & Quantity•2022

  • Geographic and demographic correlates of autism-related anti-vaccine beliefs on Twitter, 2009-15

    Open Access•Theodore S Tomeny, C Vargo et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2017

  • What's Missing from National Landline RDD Surveys

    Scott Keeter, Keeter et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2007

Unique citing works3
Citations per year0,23
Citation span2013 - 2022 (10)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae