Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Comparing the Clinical Work of Advanced Practice Professionals Working Within and Outside of Accountable Care Organizations

Bibliographic Data

ID9105016
AuthorsHannah T Neprash (0000-0002-5372-4139, Division of Health Policy & Management, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, MN, corresponding author), John F Mulcahy (Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD), John Mulcahy (0000-0001-7860-8225, Johns Hopkins University)
Year2026
Volume64
Issue1
Pages38-42
Publication date2026-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueMedical Care (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948
PublisherOvid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1097/mlr.0000000000002224
PMID41026890
OpenAlexW4414643937
LanguageEN
References cited15

BACKGROUND: Health care delivery organizations increasingly employ advanced practice professionals (APPs) and participate in alternative payment models such as accountable care organizations (ACOs). Given the former's incentive to constrain spending, APPs' practice patterns may vary in ACO-participating versus non-ACO practices. OBJECTIVES: To compare outpatient care provided by APPs and physicians through ACO participation. RESEARCH DESIGN: We used multivariate linear regression to compare measures of workload allocation and billing across ACO-participating and non-ACO practices in 2022, controlling for practice size and market. SUBJECTS: A total of 91,149 practices, 12,072 in a Medicare Shared Savings Program ACO in 2022. MEASURES: We used 100% fee-for-service Medicare claims to identify ACO-participating and non-ACO practices. For every practice, we calculated the share of outpatient encounters provided by APPs rather than physicians and the share of APP-provided encounters billed indirectly to Medicare. We also calculated the share of annual wellness visits, chronic condition care management services, transitional care management services, and postoperative visits provided by APPs. RESULTS: APPs provided a smaller share of outpatient encounters at ACO-participating versus non-ACO practices, but were more likely to bill indirectly. Among most categories of routine services (eg, annual wellness visits and chronic condition management), APPs provided a smaller share of services at ACO-participating versus non-ACO practices. In the largest quartile of practices, APP practice patterns were more similar across ACO-participation status, and indirect billing was less likely within ACOs. CONCLUSIONS: Findings provide little evidence that ACOs deploy their APP workforce in a more cost-conscious manner than non-ACOs

MEDLINE · Patient care · Work (physics) · Workforce · Workforce development · Workforce planning · Healthcare Policy and Management · Nursing Roles and Practices · Primary Care and Health Outcomes

  • Quantifying Indirect Billing Within the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule

    Open Access•John F Mulcahy, John Mulcahy et al.•JAMA Health Forum•2025

  • The Impact of Nurse Practitioner Care and Accountable Care Organization Assignment on Skilled Nursing Services and Hospital Readmissions

    Jennifer Meddings, Jason B Gibbons et al.•Medical Care•2023

  • Practice Patterns of Physicians and Nurse Practitioners in Primary Care

    Hannah T Neprash, Laura Barrie Smith et al.•Medical Care•2020

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae