Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Association Between the Commercial Characteristics of Psychotropic Drugs and Their Off-label Use

Dados Bibliográficos

ID9105070
AutoresChristopher Graziul (0000-0001-8350-077X, University of Chicago, autor correspondente), Robert V Gibbons (0000-0002-3368-6542, University of Chicago), Robert Gibbons (0000-0001-6765-3039), G Caleb Alexander (0000-0002-5622-2986, Johns Hopkins University)
Ano2012
Volume50
Fascículo11
Páginas940-947
Data de publicação2012-11-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessNão
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoMedical Care (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948
EditoraOvid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1097/mlr.0b013e31826ec272
PMID23047783
OpenAlexW2058729267
IdiomaEN
Referências citadas22

BACKGROUND: Off-label prescribing, or the use of a medicine for non-Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved indications, is especially common for psychotropic therapies and often lacks scientific support. We quantified the association between 4 commercial characteristics of prescription medicines-product age, therapeutic class age, drug volume, and promotional expenditures-and off-label use of antidepressants, antipsychotics, and mood stabilizers from 1998 through 2009. METHODS: We linked data from the IMS Health National Disease and Therapeutic Index, a nationally representative audit of office-based physicians, with data from FDA@gov and the drug compendium DrugDex, to derive information regarding off-label use. Our primary outcome was the rate (per 1000 uses) with which a drug was prescribed for non-FDA-approved indications during a given calendar year. We used mixed-effects regression models with random intercepts for each drug, adding measures of commercial characteristics as fixed effects within this model. RESULTS: From 1998 through 2009, the average proportion of all uses that occurred off-label was 23.3% for antidepressants, 60.7% for antipsychotics, and 54.2% for mood stabilizers. There was a positive association between the annual rate of off-label use and drug volume [incidence rate ratio (IRR), 1.41; 95% confidence intervals (CI), 1.32-1.50], although the strength of this association was not uniform across the therapeutic classes examined. There was also a small but statistically significant association between product age (IRR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.94-0.98) and class age (IRR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.01-1.06) and the rate of off-label use, also varying across therapeutic class. There was a statistically significant inverse association between promotional expenditures and off-label use (IRR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.93-0.96) when controlling for our other commercial characteristics. These associations were similar when examining scientifically unsupported rather than all off-label use. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that drug prescription volume, rather than product age or therapeutic class age, should be scrutinized further to identify settings where the public health impact of unsupported off-label prescribing may be particularly important

Confidence interval · Drug · Drug class · Food and drug administration · Medical prescription · Mood · Psychiatry · Psychotropic drug · Rate ratio · Internal Medicine · Medicine · Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy · Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare · Pharmaceutical studies and practices · Pharmacology

  • Characteristics of Patients Receiving Pharmaceutical Samples and Association Between Sample Receipt and Out-of-Pocket Prescription Costs

    G Caleb Alexander, James Zhang et al.•Medical Care•2008

  • Feeling and thinking

    Robert B Zajonc•American Psychologist•1980

Velocidade de citaçãohistorical
Altamente citadoNão
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae