Association Between the Commercial Characteristics of Psychotropic Drugs and Their Off-label Use
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 9105070 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Christopher Graziul (0000-0001-8350-077X, University of Chicago, autor correspondente), Robert V Gibbons (0000-0002-3368-6542, University of Chicago), Robert Gibbons (0000-0001-6765-3039), G Caleb Alexander (0000-0002-5622-2986, Johns Hopkins University) |
| Ano | 2012 |
| Volume | 50 |
| Fascículo | 11 |
| Páginas | 940-947 |
| Data de publicação | 2012-11-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Não |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Medical Care (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948 |
| Editora | Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1097/mlr.0b013e31826ec272 |
| PMID | 23047783 |
| OpenAlex | W2058729267 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referências citadas | 22 |
BACKGROUND: Off-label prescribing, or the use of a medicine for non-Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved indications, is especially common for psychotropic therapies and often lacks scientific support. We quantified the association between 4 commercial characteristics of prescription medicines-product age, therapeutic class age, drug volume, and promotional expenditures-and off-label use of antidepressants, antipsychotics, and mood stabilizers from 1998 through 2009. METHODS: We linked data from the IMS Health National Disease and Therapeutic Index, a nationally representative audit of office-based physicians, with data from FDA@gov and the drug compendium DrugDex, to derive information regarding off-label use. Our primary outcome was the rate (per 1000 uses) with which a drug was prescribed for non-FDA-approved indications during a given calendar year. We used mixed-effects regression models with random intercepts for each drug, adding measures of commercial characteristics as fixed effects within this model. RESULTS: From 1998 through 2009, the average proportion of all uses that occurred off-label was 23.3% for antidepressants, 60.7% for antipsychotics, and 54.2% for mood stabilizers. There was a positive association between the annual rate of off-label use and drug volume [incidence rate ratio (IRR), 1.41; 95% confidence intervals (CI), 1.32-1.50], although the strength of this association was not uniform across the therapeutic classes examined. There was also a small but statistically significant association between product age (IRR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.94-0.98) and class age (IRR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.01-1.06) and the rate of off-label use, also varying across therapeutic class. There was a statistically significant inverse association between promotional expenditures and off-label use (IRR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.93-0.96) when controlling for our other commercial characteristics. These associations were similar when examining scientifically unsupported rather than all off-label use. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that drug prescription volume, rather than product age or therapeutic class age, should be scrutinized further to identify settings where the public health impact of unsupported off-label prescribing may be particularly important
Confidence interval · Drug · Drug class · Food and drug administration · Medical prescription · Mood · Psychiatry · Psychotropic drug · Rate ratio · Internal Medicine · Medicine · Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy · Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare · Pharmaceutical studies and practices · Pharmacology
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | Não |