Advanced Practice Provider-inclusive Staffing Models and Patient Outcomes in Pediatric Critical Care
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9105109 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Kristin Hittle Gigli (0000-0002-3279-4162, University of Pittsburgh, corresponding author), Billie S Davis (0000-0002-6342-4244, Department of Critical Care Medicine, CRISMA Center, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, corresponding author), Grant R Martsolf (0000-0003-1942-8683, Department of Acute and Tertiary Care, University of Pittsburgh School of Nursing), Jeremy M Kahn (0000-0001-9688-5576, Department of Critical Care Medicine, CRISMA Center, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 59 |
| Issue | 7 |
| Pages | 597-603 |
| Publication date | 2021-07-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Medical Care (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948 |
| Publisher | Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1097/mlr.0000000000001531 |
| PMID | 34100461 |
| OpenAlex | W3139166676 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 33 |
BACKGROUND: Pediatric intensive care units (PICUs) are increasingly staffed with advanced practice providers (APPs), supplementing traditional physician staffing models. OBJECTIVES: We evaluate the effect of APP-inclusive staffing models on clinical outcomes and resource utilization in US PICUs. RESEARCH DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of children admitted to PICUs in 9 states in 2016 using the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's State Inpatient Databases. PICU staffing models were assessed using a contemporaneous staffing survey. We used multivariate regression to examine associations between staffing models with and without APPs and outcomes. MEASURES: The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included odds of hospital acquired conditions and ICU and hospital lengths of stay. RESULTS: The sample included 38,788 children in 40 PICUs. Patients admitted to PICUs with APP-inclusive staffing were younger (6.1±5.9 vs. 7.1±6.2 y) and more likely to have complex chronic conditions (64% vs. 43%) and organ failure on admission (25% vs. 22%), compared with patients in PICUs with physician-only staffing. There was no difference in mortality between PICU types [adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 1.23, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.83-1.81, P=0.30]. Patients in PICUs with APP-inclusive staffing had lower odds of central line-associated blood stream infections (AOR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.59-0.98, P=0.03) and catheter-associated urinary tract infections (AOR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.61-0.86, P<0.001). There were no differences in lengths of stay. CONCLUSIONS: Despite being younger and sicker, children admitted to PICUs with APP-inclusive staffing had no increased odds of mortality and lower odds of some hospital acquired conditions compared with those in PICUs with physician-only staffing. Further research can inform APP integration strategies which optimize outcomes
Confidence interval · Intensive care · Intensive care medicine · Logistic regression · MEDLINE · Odds · Odds ratio · Retrospective cohort study · Staffing · Emergency Medicine · Internal Medicine · Medicine · Nursing · Nursing education and management · Nursing Roles and Practices · Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
| Highly cited | No |
|---|