Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Advanced Practice Provider-inclusive Staffing Models and Patient Outcomes in Pediatric Critical Care

Bibliographic Data

ID9105109
AuthorsKristin Hittle Gigli (0000-0002-3279-4162, University of Pittsburgh, corresponding author), Billie S Davis (0000-0002-6342-4244, Department of Critical Care Medicine, CRISMA Center, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, corresponding author), Grant R Martsolf (0000-0003-1942-8683, Department of Acute and Tertiary Care, University of Pittsburgh School of Nursing), Jeremy M Kahn (0000-0001-9688-5576, Department of Critical Care Medicine, CRISMA Center, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, corresponding author)
Year2021
Volume59
Issue7
Pages597-603
Publication date2021-07-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueMedical Care (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948
PublisherOvid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1097/mlr.0000000000001531
PMID34100461
OpenAlexW3139166676
LanguageEN
References cited33

BACKGROUND: Pediatric intensive care units (PICUs) are increasingly staffed with advanced practice providers (APPs), supplementing traditional physician staffing models. OBJECTIVES: We evaluate the effect of APP-inclusive staffing models on clinical outcomes and resource utilization in US PICUs. RESEARCH DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of children admitted to PICUs in 9 states in 2016 using the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's State Inpatient Databases. PICU staffing models were assessed using a contemporaneous staffing survey. We used multivariate regression to examine associations between staffing models with and without APPs and outcomes. MEASURES: The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included odds of hospital acquired conditions and ICU and hospital lengths of stay. RESULTS: The sample included 38,788 children in 40 PICUs. Patients admitted to PICUs with APP-inclusive staffing were younger (6.1±5.9 vs. 7.1±6.2 y) and more likely to have complex chronic conditions (64% vs. 43%) and organ failure on admission (25% vs. 22%), compared with patients in PICUs with physician-only staffing. There was no difference in mortality between PICU types [adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 1.23, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.83-1.81, P=0.30]. Patients in PICUs with APP-inclusive staffing had lower odds of central line-associated blood stream infections (AOR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.59-0.98, P=0.03) and catheter-associated urinary tract infections (AOR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.61-0.86, P<0.001). There were no differences in lengths of stay. CONCLUSIONS: Despite being younger and sicker, children admitted to PICUs with APP-inclusive staffing had no increased odds of mortality and lower odds of some hospital acquired conditions compared with those in PICUs with physician-only staffing. Further research can inform APP integration strategies which optimize outcomes

Confidence interval · Intensive care · Intensive care medicine · Logistic regression · MEDLINE · Odds · Odds ratio · Retrospective cohort study · Staffing · Emergency Medicine · Internal Medicine · Medicine · Nursing · Nursing education and management · Nursing Roles and Practices · Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae