On the Relations between Agent and Principal
Angove's Pty Ltd v Bailey
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9193333 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Julius A W Grower (Istanbul Arel University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2018 |
| Volume | 81 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 141-153 |
| Publication date | 2018-01-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Modern Law Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0026-7961 • E-ISSN: 1468-2230 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/1468-2230.12320 |
| OpenAlex | W3145583974 |
| Language | EN |
In Angove's Pty Ltd v Bailey the Supreme Court faced ‘two important and controversial questions of commercial law’: whether an agent's authority could ever be ‘irrevocable’, and whether the receipt of money by an imminent insolvent could ever give rise to a constructive trust of that sum. It answered both in the affirmative, albeit subject to heavy qualifications. This note supports these conclusions in principle, however it will argue that the court's reasoning, especially in answering the second question, leaves much to be desired. In particular, it ignored the central role of fiduciary law in regulating the conduct of agents
Business · Constructive · Constructive trust · Duty · Fiduciary · Insolvency · Law and economics · Political science · Principal (computer security) · Receipt · Sociology · Subject (documents) · Supreme court · Accounting · Computer Science · Corporate Insolvency and Governance · Law · Legal principles and applications
| Highly cited | No |
|---|