Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Unsuccessful Bid of the British Advocate‐General to Remain on the Bench Despite Brexit

Bibliographic Data

ID9195106
AuthorsSerhii Lashyn (0000-0001-9172-9531, Serco (United Kingdom), corresponding author)
Year2021
Volume84
Issue6
Pages1414-1426
Publication date2021-11-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueModern Law Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0026-7961 • E-ISSN: 1468-2230
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/1468-2230.12651
OpenAlexW3164299209
LanguageEN

Since the announcement of the referendum result, Brexit has posed a challenge to the EU's institutions, policies and legal order. The Court of Justice of the European Union has not been an exception. This contribution examines former Advocate‐General Eleanor Sharpston's failed bid to reverse her premature removal from the bench due to the UK's formal withdrawal from the Union. This case note argues that Eleanor Sharpston indeed should not have been allowed to stay in office until her term expired, critically engages with the Court's refusal to take the matter within the ambit of its judicial review and reflects on whether these developments meet the standards of judicial independence

Brexit · Economic Justice · Economics · European court of justice · European union · European Union law · Independence (probability theory) · International trade · Order (exchange) · Political science · Politics · Referendum · European and International Law Studies · Law

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae