Restoring Confidence
Replacing the Fixed‐term Parliaments Act 2011
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9195642 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Robert Craig (0000-0003-0036-2709), Robert J Craig (0000-0002-1113-4755, Oxford University Press (United Kingdom), corresponding author) |
| Year | 2018 |
| Volume | 81 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 480-508 |
| Publication date | 2018-05-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Modern Law Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0026-7961 • E-ISSN: 1468-2230 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/1468-2230.12342 |
| OpenAlex | W2802318151 |
| Language | EN |
This article considers both the Fixed‐term Parliaments Act 2011 (FTPA) and the political constitution, to place the former in its political and constitutional context. It begins by setting out the background to the FTPA – which was a part of a Coalition agreement – and considers difficulties with the most commonly‐made arguments in favour of fixed‐term parliaments. The second part of the article considers the impact and potential practical legal consequences if the FTPA is repealed without any replacement, arguing that it will only be possible to revive the ‘dissolution’ prerogative by express words in a new Act. The final part of the article addresses the question of whether the prerogative should be revived, before arguing both that it should not and that a statutory power to call an election should be conferred on the Prime Minister subject to a vote by simple majority in the House of Commons
Constitution · Context (archaeology) · House of Commons · Law and economics · Parliament · Political science · Politics · Prerogative · Sociology · Statutory law · Term (time) · History · Law · Legal Language and Interpretation · Political Systems and Governance
| Highly cited | No |
|---|