Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Rise of Statutory Wills and the Limits of Best Interests Decision‐Making in Inheritance

Bibliographic Data

ID9196735
AuthorsRosie Harding (0000-0002-3063-3525, University of Birmingham, corresponding author)
Year2015
Volume78
Issue6
Pages945-970
Publication date2015-11-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueModern Law Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0026-7961 • E-ISSN: 1468-2230
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/1468-2230.12156
OpenAlexW1959155478
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited23

This article addresses ‘statutory wills’ executed under the M ental C apacity A ct 2005 ( MCA ) for persons with impaired mental capacity. The article provides an overview of the historical development of statutory wills, before exploring their rising contemporary significance. It considers the shift from the previous ‘hypothetical substituted judgment’ test to the contemporary ‘best interests’ orientation of the MCA . The article assesses the problems that the best interests approach raises in this area, and its (in)compatibility with the right to equal recognition before the law under the UN C onvention on the R ights of P ersons with D isabilities, arguing that the pervasive reach of best interests in contemporary mental capacity law requires reconsideration. The paper concludes by suggesting that a more limited framing of the power to execute statutory wills is required in order to appropriately balance the rights of individuals with disabilities with practical considerations around the distribution of assets on death

Best interests · Framing (construction) · Law and economics · Political science · Sociology · Statutory law · Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints · History · Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse · Law · Legal principles and applications

  • A capabilities approach to best interests assessments

    Open Access•Michael Thomson•Legal Studies•2021

  • Polyphonic Legality

    Open Access•Rosie Harding, E Peel•Social & Legal Studies•2019

  • Ethics needs principles—four can encompass the rest—and respect for autonomy should be “first among equals”

    Raanan Gillon•Journal of Medical Ethics•2003

  • Children's Rights and the Developing Law

    Open Access•Jane Fortin•Children's Rights and the…•2009

  • Legislating personhood

    Open Access•Eilionóir Flynn, Anna Arstein-Kerslake•International Journal of Law in…•2014

  • Sexuality and Succession Law

    Open Access•Daniel Monk, Daniel Bertrand Monk•Feminist Legal Studies•2011

  • Legal constructions of dementia

    Rosie Harding•The Journal of Social Welfare Law•2012

  • Informal carers and the private law

    Jonathan Herring•The Journal of Social Welfare Law•2013

  • Enduring Love? Attitudes to Family and Inheritance Law in England and Wales

    Open Access•Gillian Douglas, Hilary Woodward et al.•Journal of Law and Society•2011

  • The U nited N ations C onvention on the R ights of P ersons with D isabilities and M ental H ealth L aw

    Open Access•Peter Bartlett•Modern Law Review•2012

Citations per year0.29
Citation span2019 - 2021 (3)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae