Cloud Crypto Land

Bibliographic Data

ID9197146
AuthorsEdmund Schuster (0000-0002-9355-535X, Centre for Mental Health, corresponding author)
Year2021
Volume84
Issue5
Pages974-1004
Publication date2021-09-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueModern Law Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0026-7961 • E-ISSN: 1468-2230
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/1468-2230.12603
OpenAlexW2991447569
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited2

The supposed disruptive and transformational potential of blockchain technology has received widespread attention in the media, from legislators, and from academics across disciplines. While much of this attention has revolved around cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin, many see the true promise of blockchain technology in its potential use for transactions in traditional assets, as well as for facilitating self‐executing ‘smart contracts’, which replace vague and imprecise natural language with unambiguous computer code. This article presents a simple legal argument against the feasibility of a meaningful blockchain‐based economic system. Blockchain‐based systems are shown to be unsuitable for transactions in traditional assets, unless design choices are made which render the use of the technology pointless. The same argument is shown to apply to smart contracts. Legal and practical obstacles therefore mean that, outside its original realm of cryptocurrencies, blockchain technology is highly unlikely to transform economic interactions in the real world

Argument (complex analysis) · Blockchain · Cloud computing · Computer security · Cryptocurrency · Data science · Disruptive technology · Economics · Epistemology · Management · Political science · Realm · Simple (philosophy) · Smart contract · Transformational leadership · Blockchain Technology Applications and Security · Computer Science · Engineering · FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance · Law

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access