Biology and Social Responsibility

My starting point is a familiar, simple one: the natural sciences are simultaneously products of social forces and of individual scientists' curiosity awakened and channeled by these forces. Both of these facets must be kept in mind in analyzing the history of science and in planning for its future. In this paper I will explore this dual nature of science, at a general philosophical level and in the specific instance of modern biology, which in the past forty years, has seen a series of striking successes, with U.S. science playing a dominant role. Basic discoveries about the structure and function of genes, the immune system, brain function, biochemistry, etc., have provided both a new understanding of living systems and new abilities to manipulate them. The concrete results include new medical therapies, enhanced agricultural production, prenatal diagnosis of genetic diseases, and industrial uses of "engineered" bacteria and other microorganisms.This article can also be found at the Monthly Review website, where most recent articles are published in full.Click here to purchase a PDF version of this article at the Monthly Review website

Biology · Cognitive science · Curiosity · Dual (grammatical number) · Engineering ethics · Environmental ethics · Epistemology · Evolutionary biology · Function (biology) · Natural (archaeology) · Point (geometry) · Simple (philosophy) · Sociology · Climate Change Communication and Perception · Computer Science · Engineering · Mathematics · Neuroscience · Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease · Philosophy · Psychology · Science, Research, and Medicine