Ecology and Revolution
A Letter to Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen, July 31, 1974
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9198798 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Paul M Sweezy (corresponding author) |
| Year | 2017 |
| Volume | 68 |
| Issue | 9 |
| Pages | 55 |
| Publication date | 2017-02-06 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Monthly Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0027-0520 • E-ISSN: 0027-0520 |
| Publisher | Monthly Review Foundation (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.14452/mr-068-09-2017-02_6 |
| OpenAlex | W2585883569 |
| Language | EN |
In the early 1970s, MR editors Harry Magdoff and Paul Sweezy increasingly introduced ecological themes into the magazine, and began to question the viability of unlimited, exponential economic growth in a limited biosphere. Sweezy, in particular, was deeply interested in ecological problems, a topic he began to write on in this period, in essays such as "Cars and Cities"..., and to which he returned on various occasions until the end of his life.... [In this 1974 letter to the influential ecological economist, Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen, Sweezy outlined] the revolutionary implications of ecology, and the break that these necessitated with pure "economism"—a rupture that only a truly revolutionary socialism could bring about.Click here to purchase a PDF version of this article at the Monthly Review website
Biology · Biosphere · Communism · Economic history · Environmental ethics · Political science · Socialism · Sociology · Ecology · Global Energy and Sustainability Research · History · Law · Philosophy
| Highly cited | No |
|---|