Requiem for Social Democracy
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9200484 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Daniel Singer (0000-0001-5479-2806), Daniel E Singer (0000-0001-6145-4848, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1997 |
| Volume | 48 |
| Issue | 8 |
| Pages | 1 |
| Publication date | 1997-01-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Monthly Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0027-0520 • E-ISSN: 0027-0520 |
| Publisher | Monthly Review Foundation (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.14452/mr-048-08-1997-01_1 |
| OpenAlex | W2005238118 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
The fall of the Soviet empire was greeted not only as the funeral of socialism. It was also described as marking the final dead end for all revolutionary roads. The practitioners of revolution—Robespierre and Cromwell—as well as its theoreticians—Luxemburg and Marx—were lumped together in retrospective condemnation. Logically, such an offensive against the very idea of radical transformation should have been coupled with praise for gradualism, for Fabian tactics, for progressive change. To use two cliches at once, the "collapse of communism" could have been combined with the "triumph of social democracy." Actually, nothing of the kind happened. On the contrary, the disintegration of the neo-stalinist system has been followed by a major crisis of social-democracy, taken here in its very narrow current definition—the reformist management of capitalist society.This article can also be found at the Monthly Review website, where most recent articles are published in full.Click here to purchase a PDF version of this article at the Monthly Review website
Ancient history · Art · Communism · Democracy · Economic history · Empire · Epistemology · Literature · Marxist philosophy · Nothing · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Praise · Social democracy · Socialism · Sociology · History · Law · Philosophy · Political Economy and Marxism
| Citations per year | 0.14 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 1998 - 2020 (23) |
| Highly cited | No |