Reply to “The Myth of ‘Environmental Catastrophism’”

Ian Angus constructs a strawperson in his article "The Myth of 'Environmental Catastrophism'" (MR, September 2013), which discusses Catastrophism: The Apocalyptic Politics of Collapse and Rebirth, which consists of essays by myself, as well as Sasha Lilley, David McNally, and James Davis. The book is concerned with the political uses of catastrophe and whether actual catastrophes or catastrophic rhetoric can spur people to action. At the heart of Catastrophism is the question of politicization. My essay, which Angus primarily focuses upon, looks at the indisputably catastrophic and urgent devastation of the environment...and asks why environmental movements in the global North have not been effective at moving people to action by simply evoking the calamity of the situation.This article can also be found at the Monthly Review website, where most recent articles are published in full.Click here to purchase a PDF version of this article at the Monthly Review website

Action (physics) · Environmental ethics · Mythology · Political science · Politics · Rhetoric · Theology · Classics · Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature · History · Law · Philosophy