The National Security State
The End of Separation of Powers
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9201113 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Michael E Tigar (corresponding author) |
| Year | 2014 |
| Volume | 66 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 136 |
| Publication date | 2014-07-09 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Monthly Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0027-0520 • E-ISSN: 0027-0520 |
| Publisher | Monthly Review Foundation (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.14452/mr-066-03-2014-07_9 |
| OpenAlex | W2027796453 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 4 |
On March 11, 2014, Senator Dianne Feinstein went to the U.S. Senate floor to announce that the CIA had sought to sabotage a Senate Intelligence Committee investigation of torture and unlawful detention.... Already, government lawyers had convinced courts that there should be no judicial review of torture and unlawful detention. Such review, it was argued, was beyond the competence of judges, and the executive branch of government needed unfettered discretion to deal with national security threats.... The net result is that the CIA, the NSA, and all the other executive branch agencies engaged in surveillance, detention, torture, rendition of suspects, and even targeted killings by drone strike have claimed immunity from accountability by either of the two other branches—legislative and judicial. What they have done, why they have done it, and why their actions are or are not lawful—all of this has retreated behind a wall of secrecy. The claim made by government lawyers that there has been and will be legislative oversight turns out to be false.This article can also be found at the Monthly Review website, where most recent articles are published in full.Click here to purchase a PDF version of this article at the Monthly Review website
Accountability · Discretion · Executive branch · Government (linguistics) · Human rights · Judicial review · Legislature · National security · Political science · Secrecy · Separation of powers · State (computer science) · Terrorism · Torture · Intelligence, Security, War Strategy · International Law and Human Rights · Law · Torture, Ethics, and Law
| Highly cited | No |
|---|