On the Origins of Animalist Marxism
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9201114 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Christian Stache (0000-0003-0985-0178, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2018 |
| Pages | 22-41 |
| Publication date | 2018-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Monthly Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0027-0520 • E-ISSN: 0027-0520 |
| Publisher | Monthly Review Foundation (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.14452/mr-070-07-2018-11_2 |
| OpenAlex | W2903087350 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
In human-animal studies and critical animal studies, the most influential treatment of animalist Marxism and Marxist animalism has been developed by Ted Benton on the basis of his interpretation of Karl Marx's work. This article focuses minutely on Benton's argument and Marx's Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844 (or Paris Manuscripts), refuting Benton's contentions point by point and forcefully challenging the idea that Marx's work was speciesist in orientation
Argument (complex analysis) · Epistemology · Interpretation (philosophy) · Linguistics · Marxist philosophy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Environmental Philosophy and Ethics · Law · Philosophy
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,67 |
| Citation span | 2020 - 2026 (7) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |