Some Theoretical Implications

Bibliographic Data

ID9201446
AuthorsPaul A Baran, Paul M Sweezy
Year2012
Volume64
Issue3
Pages24
Publication date2012-07-03
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueMonthly Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0027-0520 • E-ISSN: 0027-0520
PublisherMonthly Review Foundation (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.14452/mr-064-03-2012-07_3
OpenAlexW2318220342
LanguageEN
Citations received6

That all is not well in the realm of bourgeois economic theory is strongly felt by its closest observers. Professor Mason's blunt statement that "the functioning of the corporate system has not to date been adequately explained," could hardly be contradicted by anyone familiar with contemporary economic literature. Its most conspicuous feature is, indeed, this very failure to come to grips with the most important aspects of what, one would think, should constitute its central problem.... The reasons for this striking reluctance to place the realities of modern capitalism where they belong: at the center of theoretical attention, are not far to seek... There can be no doubt that the model of a perfectly competitive market economy is "more tractable," that the examination of its manifold properties is more readily achievable by means of conventional tools of economic analysis than that of a system dominated by oligopolistic corporations. It may not be economics' claim to applause, but it is understandable that most of its practitioners prefer not to tackle "intractable" matters, but to move along the line of the least theoretic resistance.This article can also be found at the Monthly Review website, where most recent articles are published in full.Click here to purchase a PDF version of this article at the Monthly Review website

Bourgeoisie · Capitalism · Economics · Epistemology · Neoclassical economics · Oligopoly · Political science · Politics · Positive economics · Realm · Resistance (ecology) · Sociology · Statement (logic) · Economic Theory and Institutions · Law · Philosophy

Tools

Open DOI