Mathus' Essay On Population at Age 200
A Marxian View
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9202941 |
|---|---|
| Authors | John Bellamy Foster (0000-0001-7418-3004, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1998 |
| Volume | 50 |
| Issue | 7 |
| Pages | 1 |
| Publication date | 1998-12-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Monthly Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0027-0520 • E-ISSN: 0027-0520 |
| Publisher | Monthly Review Foundation (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.14452/mr-050-07-1998-11_1 |
| OpenAlex | W2038120906 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 7 |
Since it was first published 200 years ago in 1798, no other single work has constituted such a bastion of bourgeois thought as Thomas Malthus' Essay on the Principle of Population. No other work was more hated by the English working class, nor so strongly criticized by Marx and Engels. Although the Malthusian principle of population in its classical form was largely vanquished intellectually by the mid-nineteenth century, it continued to reemerge in new forms. In the late nineteenth century it took on new life as a result of the Darwinian revolution and the rise of social Darwinism. And in the late twentieth century Malthusianism reemerged once again in the form of neo-Malthusian ecology.This article can also be found at the Monthly Review website, where most recent articles are published in full.Click here to purchase a PDF version of this article at the Monthly Review website
Bourgeoisie · Darwinism · Economic history · Epistemology · Eugenics · Political science · Population · Social Darwinism · Sociology · Classics · Demography · Economic Theory and Policy · History · Law · Philosophy · Political Economy and Marxism
People are good at stewardship
Coping with Trade Liberalization
Ecology and marx's vision of communism
A materialist analysis of slavery and sharecropping in the Southern United States
The American anthropocene
The asymmetric environmental consequences of population change
Political Neo-Malthusianism and the Progression of India's Green Revolution
| Citations per year | 0.27 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2000 - 2026 (27) |
| Highly cited | No |