Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The “protection” of “woman”

A history of legal attitudes toward women's workplace freedom

Bibliographic Data

ID9236339
AuthorsCarrie Crenshaw (University of Alabama, corresponding author)
Year1995
Volume81
Issue1
Pages63-82
Publication date1995-02-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueQuarterly Journal of Speech (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0033-5630 • E-ISSN: 1479-5779
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/00335639509384097
OpenAlexW1991502805
LanguageEN
Citations received6
References cited12

This essay argues that current symbols can be attitudinally united with historical symbols despite seeming dissimilarities in their construction. This thesis is illustrated by a comparative analysis of the historical dispute over protective legislation for women and the current controversy over fetal protection policies. “Protection” historically meant the protection of “woman” as mother of future generations by the state. Today, “protection” means protection of the “unborn child” by corpora‐lions. Despite seeming dissimilarities, these symbols are attitudinally united because both reduce the interests of all women to motherhood and thereby limit women's autonomy in the workplace. Though contemporary symbols representing women may appear to be more egalitarian, this analysis indicates that the historical inequality of women in the workforce haunts contemporary corporate policy

Autonomy · Legislation · Political science · Sociology · State (computer science) · Workforce · Gender Politics and Representation · Gender Studies · Law

  • Work Life, Work Environment and Work Safety in Transition

    Open Access•Lenore Layman, Annette Thörnquist•Labour History•2003

  • Proclaiming the Unborn Child’s Humanity

    Christine M Willingham•Women s Studies in Communication•2024

  • United States v. Virginia

    Katie L Gibson, Katie Gibson•Women s Studies in Communication•2006

  • Excavating Gender in Women's Early Claims to Political Asylum in the United States

    Sara L Mckinnon•Women s Studies in Communication•2010

  • The rhetorical boundaries of ‘the law’

    Marouf Hasian, Celeste Michelle Condit et al.•Quarterly Journal of Speech•1996

  • Rhetoric in the public sphere and the discourse of law and democracy

    Hanns Hohmann•Quarterly Journal of Speech•1998

  • The Bonds of Womanhood

    James M Saslow, Nancy F Cott•Bonds of Womanhood•1997

  • A Grammar of Motives

    Kenneth Burke•Grammar of Motives•2023

  • Quarrels That Have Shaped the Constitution

    Stephen Mitchell, Stephen R Mitchell et al.•The Western Political Quarterly•1965

  • Rhetorical criticism as moral action

    James F Klumpp, Thomas A Hollihan•Quarterly Journal of Speech•1989

  • Decoding Abortion Rhetoric

    Joan Vera Vecchia•American Journal of Sociology•1990

Citations per year0.2
Citation span1996 - 2024 (29)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae