Signs of protest rhetoric
From Logos to logistics in Luther's Ninety-Five Theses
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9237133 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Andrew Culp (Whitman College, corresponding author), Kevin Kuswa (University of South Carolina) |
| Year | 2016 |
| Volume | 102 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 150-165 |
| Publication date | 2016-04-02 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Quarterly Journal of Speech (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0033-5630 • E-ISSN: 1479-5779 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/00335630.2016.1154595 |
| OpenAlex | W2308307660 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 7 |
Our paper conceptualizes protest rhetoric in order to theorize the underlying relationship between communication and subjectivity. We do this by highlighting how rhetorical protest challenges the sovereignty of voice. Our argument is that Martin Luther's Ninety-Five Theses is an example of a sign that protests. To make this argument, we use a materialist method from media studies that simultaneously examines the formal capacities of a sign that protests and maps its historical transformation. Our analysis opens with the two prevailing accounts of Luther's theses: disputation and dissemination. We extend both disputation and dissemination by placing them in a “universal history” of protest rhetoric that grounds many accepted critical rhetorical theories in specific systems of representation. Drawing together our findings, we conclude by urging the replacement of logos and logocentrism with the logistics of protest rhetoric in order to link together disputation and dissemination as a mechanism for both change and subjection
Argument (complex analysis) · Epistemology · Linguistics · Logos Bible Software · Political science · Politics · Representation (politics) · Rhetoric · Rhetorical question · Sign (mathematics) · Sociology · Sovereignty · Theology · Law · Media Studies and Communication · Philosophy · Rhetoric and Communication Studies · Social Media and Politics
| Highly cited | No |
|---|