Derailing the capitalist engine
Theorizing relations of mujō through Mugen Train
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9240971 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Megu Itoh (Rikkyo University), Fielding Montgomery (0000-0001-8735-1732, Department of Communication, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA, corresponding author), Taylor Hourigan (0000-0003-2800-8939, Department of Communication, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 111 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 23-44 |
| Publication date | 2025-01-02 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Quarterly Journal of Speech (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0033-5630 • E-ISSN: 1479-5779 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/00335630.2024.2340036 |
| OpenAlex | W4394961628 |
| Language | EN |
As one of the most successful pieces of transnational popular culture, we rhetorically analyze the compelling critique of neoliberal capitalism in the 2020 anime film, Demon Slayer: Kimetsu no Yaiba the Movie: Mugen Train. Alongside this criticism of neoliberal capitalism, we theorize relations of mujō (無常/impermanence) found in the film, foregrounding this Buddhist principle to advance ways of being that resist neoliberal capitalist impulses. We forward three tenets that emerge in our analysis of this film: (1) recognizing that all beings are embedded within shared entanglements; (2) holding all beings responsible to serve others; (3) transcending the bounds of death by passing the torch of omoi (想い/human feeling). We argue that Mugen Train’s protagonists, the Demon Slayers, embody mujō that demonstrates how those under capitalist subjugation can only be liberated by recognizing human community grounded in such a relational ethic. We thus situate relations of mujō as a critical rhetorical theory that releases us from the neoliberal capitalist pursuit of mugen (無限/limitless)
Economics · Epistemology · Neoclassical economics · Sociology · Japanese History and Culture · Philosophy · Political Economy and Marxism
| Highly cited | No |
|---|