Minimally Destructive Radiocarbon Dating of Caprine Dung
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 9242467 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Daniel Fuks (0000-0003-4686-6128, Museum of London Archaeology, autor de correspondencia), Niamh O’Neill-Munro (0000-0002-4864-8370, Queen's University Belfast), Paula J Reimer (0000-0001-9238-2146, Queen's University Belfast), Tali Erickson-Gini (0000-0003-2902-3831, Israel Antiquities Authority), Guy Bar-Oz (0000-0002-1009-5619, University of Haifa), Roy Galili (Ben-Gurion University of the Negev), Scott Bucking (0000-0002-3237-183X, DePaul University) |
| Año | 2023 |
| Volumen | 65 |
| Número | 4 |
| Páginas | 832-847 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2023-08-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Radiocarbon (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0033-8222 • E-ISSN: 1945-5755 |
| Editorial | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/rdc.2023.70 |
| OpenAlex | W4386424640 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referencias citadas | 35 |
Archaeological dung pellets are time capsules of ancient herbivore diets and gut flora, informing on past agropastoral activity, ecology, and animal health. Improving multi-proxy approaches is key to maximizing this finite archaeological resource. Through experiments with standard pretreatments used in radiocarbon ( 14 C) dating, we address a fundamental problem in maximal multi-proxy analysis: How to chronometrically date individual caprine pellets while conserving as much as possible for additional analyses? We applied acid-alkali-acid (AAA) or acid-only pretreatments to 37 samples of ancient and recent sheep/goat dung pellets from sites in the Negev desert, Israel, measuring weight-loss due to pretreatment. Shavings of outer surfaces and remaining inner pellets of four pairs were dated and compared. We found that (i) sample-specific factors affect pretreatment survivability, including preservation quality and initial sample size; (ii) given sufficient start weight, AAA can be used to pretreat sheep/goat coprolites; (iii) 100 mg appeared a desirable minimum sample weight before pretreatment; and (iv) shavings of coprolites’ outer surface produced 14 C dates equivalent to dates obtained from inner coprolites. Whereas standard coprolite analysis protocols discard shavings removed from outer surfaces to avoid contamination, our findings indicate their efficacy for 14 C dating. This offers an important addition to workflows for multi-proxy coprolite analysis
Animal science · Archaeology · Biology · Geography · Herbivore · Pellets · Proxy (statistics) · Radiocarbon dating · Archaeology and ancient environmental studies · Ecology · Environmental Science · Geology · Isotope Analysis in Ecology · Mathematics · Paleontology · Paleopathology and ancient diseases
Ovi-caprid dung as an indicator of paleovegetation and paleoclimate in northwestern China
The Neanderthal Meal
Carbon Isotope Ratios of Plant n -Alkanes and Microstratigraphy Analyses of Dung Accumulations in a Pastoral Nomadic Winter Campsite (Eastern Mongolia)
Dismantling Dung
Species identification of archaeological dung remains
Multiproxy analysis of omnivore and herbivore coprolites
The Avdat in Late Antiquity Project
Methods for the examination of cattle, sheep and goat dung in prehistoric wetland settlements with examples of the sites Alleshausen-Täschenwiesen and Alleshausen-Grundwiesen (around cal 2900 BC) at Lake Federsee, south-west Germany
Animal dung from arid environments and archaeobotanical methodologies for its analysis
Plant macrofossils and pollen in goat/sheep faeces from the Neolithic lake-shore settlement Arbon Bleiche 3, Switzerland
Dung fungi as a proxy for megaherbivores
Dung in the dumps
A Standardized Method for the Description and the Study of Coprolites
Shepherds and plants in the Alps
Discussion Reporting of 14 C Data
The Avdat in Late Antiquity Project
The Use of Dung as Fuel
Herbivorous livestock dung
Evidence for non-random distribution of pollen in human coprolites
Caravanserai middens on desert roads
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | No |